272
ZPOCPC
CH
Art. 334 Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC)
CPC; Parte seconda: Disposizioni speciali; Titolo nono: Mezzi di impugnazione; Capitolo 4: Interpretazione e rettifica
Art. 334 CPC
Se il dispositivo è poco chiaro, ambiguo o incompleto oppure in contraddizione con i considerandi, il giudice, su domanda di una parte o d’ufficio, interpreta o rettifica la decisione. Nella domanda devono essere indicati i punti contestati e le modifiche auspicate.
Gli articoli 330 e 331 si applicano per analogia. Se la rettifica concerne errori di scrittura o di calcolo il giudice può rinunciare a interpellare le parti.
La decisione sulla domanda di interpretazione o di rettifica è impugnabile mediante reclamo.
La decisione interpretata o rettificata è notificata alle parti.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (887)
LE220011 · zh (Art. 334 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Spousal Support and Cost Allocation Appeal Ruling
This provision was used to correct a procedural omission in the first instance decision regarding the netting of party compensation.
102 2025 215 · fr (art. 334 al. 1 CPC)
Appeal Costs Rectification Due to Contradictory Disposition
The request for rectification of the decision was admitted based on this provision.
AA.22.25.62.2025 · vd (Art. 334 al. 1 CPC)
Insured Party Seeks Rectification of Benefit Suspension Ruling; Court Rejects Expansion of Prior Judgment Scope
This provision was used as the procedural basis for rejecting the application for interpretation/rectification, as the court considered the CPC applicable supplementarily.
C/16570/2022 · ge (art. 334 al. 1 CPC)
Divorce Appeal: Custody, Support, Marital Home, and Pension Division Modification
Used to modify the dispositive regarding the exclusive use of the marital home by completing the terms of the lease agreement.
C/10427/2022 · ge (art. 334 CPC)
Application for Rectification Dismissed Due to Scope Limitation
The request for rectification was declared inadmissible based on the conditions outlined in this article, although the final order cites it implicitly by referring to the procedure governing rectification.
C/28186/2019 · ge (art. 334 al. 3 CPC)
Financial Institution v. Insurer: Evidentiary Omission and Right to be Heard in Crime Insurance Claim
Cited as part of the requirements for the admissibility of the appeals.
C/27061/2019 · ge (art. 334 CPC)
Commercial Rent Reduction Rectification: Date Correction Upheld, Post-2023 Claim Rejected
The court applied this article regarding the admissibility of the requests for rectification of the previous judgment.
C1 23 115 · vs (art. 334 CPC)
Employee Wage Claim and Employer Overpayment Counterclaim Appeal
Cited as the basis for the judge rectifying the initial error in the first instance dispositive regarding costs/attorneys' fees.
C1 24 121 · vs (art. 334 al. 1 CPC)
Mother Granted De Facto Custody; Father's Visitation Modified
Cited as the basis for the exclusive competence of the first-instance authority (APEA) to rule on the rectification of the decision's wording (Point 1).
LF240116 · zh (Art. 334 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Appellate Review of Substantive Amendment to Judgment in Will Probate
Cited in the reasoning section to define when a court can undertake clarification or correction of a decision.
LF240116 · zh (Art. 334 Abs. 1 ZPO)
Appellate Review of Substantive Amendment to Judgment in Will Probate
The court references this article in the reasoning to define the scope of review for the appeal, which challenges the propriety of a correction decision made under this article.
LF240116 · zh (Art. 334 Abs. 2 ZPO)
Appellate Review of Substantive Amendment to Judgment in Will Probate
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the procedure for correction upon a party's request.
LF240116 · zh (Art. 334 Abs. 3 ZPO)
Appellate Review of Substantive Amendment to Judgment in Will Probate
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the appealability of decisions on requests for clarification or correction.
VWBES.2024.260 · so (Art. 334 ZPO)
Father v. Child and Adult Protection Authority on Custody Clarification Jurisdiction
The court noted that if clarification or precision of a judgment was sought, the proper legal remedy was an application for clarification under Art. 334 ZPO to the deciding court, not the KESB.
101 2024 451 · fr (Art. 334 al. 1 CPC)
Divorce Decree Rectification Regarding Spanish Property Co-Ownership Description
The request for rectification of the decision was admitted based on this article because the original operative part was incomplete.