272 ZPOCPC

CH

Art. 115 Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Condanna alle spese

CPC; Parte prima: Disposizioni generali; Titolo ottavo: Spese giudiziarie e gratuito patrocinio; Capitolo 3: Normative speciali in materia di spese

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (426 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 115 CPC · Condanna alle spese

In caso di malafede o temerarietà processuali, le spese processuali possono essere addossate a una parte anche nelle procedure gratuite.

Per le controversie di cui all’articolo 114 lettera f le spese processuali possono essere addossate alla parte soccombente se contro di essa è stato ordinato un divieto secondo l’articolo 28 b CC o una sorveglianza elettronica secondo l’articolo 28 c CC.

← Art. 114 CPC Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (CPC) - Oggetto Art. 116 CPC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (359)

A/2935/2023 · ge (art. 115 al. 1 CPC)

Insured Claim for Sickness Benefit Dismissed Due to No Salary Loss; Insurer's Fraud Claim Rejected.

The court applied this article to decide on the allocation of half of the judicial costs due to the applicant's bad faith.

HC.2025.470 · vd (Art. 115 CPC)

Employee Wrongful Dismissal Upheld After 22 Years of Service

Applied to impose judicial costs on the appellant due to their temerarious proceedings.

ZVE.2025.12 · ag (Art. 115 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Labor Arbitration Barred by Prior Settlement and Release of Claims

Cited as the basis for not awarding party compensation in labor disputes up to a certain value, unless there is malicious or frivolous litigation.

LA240020 · zh (Art. 115 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Employer Liability for Non-Compliant Sickness Insurance Coverage During Probationary Termination

Cited in relation to the assessment of whether court costs should be imposed due to malicious or wanton conduct.

ZVE.2024.14 · ag (Art. 115 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Employee Wages and Employer's Unsubstantiated Counterclaims

Allows imposing court costs even in free proceedings in case of malicious or frivolous litigation.

C/4451/2021 · ge (art. 115 CPC)

Appeal Regarding Imposition of Judicial Costs in Tenancy Dispute

This provision, concerning the charging of costs due to reckless or bad faith proceedings, was the basis for the initial judgment's order (ch. 2) which the appeal sought to annul; the Court's decision to annul that order implies a ruling on the application/rejection of this article.

LA240004 · zh (Art. 115 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Employee Reference Alteration and COVID-19 Policy Dispute Dismissed with Cost Modification

Cited to exclude exceptions to the cost-free nature of the appeal procedure.

C/13276/2021 · ge (art. 115 CPC)

Wrongful Termination Due to Biased Internal Investigation

This provision was cited in relation to the possibility of imposing legal costs due to temerity or bad faith, although the claim against the employers was rejected.

16.2023.29 · ti (art. 115 CPC)

Employee Wage Claim and Employer Set-Off Appeal

Cited to justify not finding the case frivolous, thus aligning with the order that no procedural costs are collected.

16.2023.26 · ti (art. 115 CPC)

Employer Obligation to Reimburse Unemployment Benefits Following Illness-Extended Notice Period

Cited in the reasoning to explain why no court costs were levied due to the absence of procedural temerity.

ZVE.2024.31 · ag (Art. 115 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Employment Contract Appeal Dismissed for Vexatious Conduct and Lack of Merits

Allows for imposing court costs on a party in case of malicious or frivolous litigation.

16.2023.5 · ti (art. 115 CPC)

Employee Overtime Compensation and Sick Pay Calculation Dispute

Cited in relation to the absence of punitive costs (temerarietà processuale).

ZSU.2024.66 · ag (Art. 115 Abs. 1 ZPO)

Tenants' Failure to Appear Justifies Cost Sanction

Cited as the legal basis for imposing costs in otherwise free conciliation proceedings due to malicious or frivolous litigation.

C/9701/2023 · ge (art. 115 al. 1 CPC)

Recognition of Foreign Divorce and Retroactive Extinction of Marital Protective Measures

Basis for deciding on the costs of the first instance and appeal due to the appellant's temerarious conduct.

16.2022.16 · ti (art. 115 CPC)

Personnel Leasing Company vs. Employee: Interpretation of Shift Bonus Entitlement under CCL PP

Cited in the reasoning section to exclude the possibility of procedural temerity (which would negate free proceedings).