Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
232.11 MSCHGLPM CH

Art. 5 Legge federale del 28 agosto 1992 sulla protezione dei marchi e delle indicazioni di provenienza (LPM) - Insorgenza del diritto al marchio

LPM; Titolo primo: Marchi; Capitolo 1: Disposizioni generali
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (111 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 5 LPM · Insorgenza del diritto al marchio

Il diritto al marchio insorge con la registrazione.

← Art. 4 LPM Legge federale del 28 agosto 1992 sulla protezione dei marchi e delle indicazioni di provenienza (LPM) - Definizione Art. 6 LPM →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)

B-6389/2023 (Art. 5 LPM)
Trademark Cancellation Denied Due to Insufficient Proof of Non-Use
Establishes that the right to a trademark arises upon registration.
HG230108 · zh (Art. 5 MSchG)
Trademark Nullity for Abusive Registration Against Prior Rights
The court found the Swiss trademark void due to abusive registration, as explicitly stated in order no. 1 and referenced in order no. 5 regarding notification to the IGE.
C/8787/2021 · ge (art. 5 LPM)
Trademark Owner v. Watch Competitor (Likelihood of Confusion)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for trademark registration.
B-2597/2020 (art. 5 LPM)
Cancellation of Swiss Trademarks for Watches and Watch Parts
Used to establish that trademark rights arise from registration.
C/6464/2018 · ge (art. 5 LPM)
Textile Company v. Chinese Company: Trademark Nullification Due to Likelihood of Confusion
Cited in the reasoning concerning the acquisition of trademark rights by registration.
B-970/2019 (Art. 5 f. MSchG)
Verbal Identity, Visual Distinction: Trademark Registration Upheld
Cited to explain when trademark rights arise and belong to the first filer.
HG 2013 20 · be (Art. 5 MSchG)
Trademark Invalidity Due to Abusive Registration and Mootness of Expired Mark Counterclaim
The court found the trademark to be void because its filing was abusive (rechtsmissbräuchlich), which is governed by this article.
AbR.1992.93.Nr.12 · ow (Art. 5 MSchG)
Plasticolor, Inc. v. Plastik-Color
Cited for the legal presumption of a trademark holder's rights after registration of a 'used mark'.
OG.2011.00017 · gl (Art. 5 und Art. 6 MSchG)
DeepGreen Datacenter AG v. green.ch
These articles concern the creation of trademark rights through registration and are mentioned in the reasoning. They are not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
B-3536/2011 (Art. 5 MSchG)
Medidata v. MediData: Likelihood of Confusion in Trademark Registration
Cited in the reasoning regarding the creation of trademark rights through registration.
B-1755/2007 (art. 5 LPM)
Likelihood of Confusion Due to Similar Marks for Clothing
Provision stating that the right to a trademark arises from registration.
HG230108 · zh (Art. 5 MSchG)
Zurich Court Nullifies Trademark for Abusive Filing and Bad Faith
Cited in the final order (No. 5) to mandate notification to the Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property regarding the finding of nullity.