232.11 MSCHGLPM

CH

Art. 13 Legge federale del 28 agosto 1992 sulla protezione dei marchi e delle indicazioni di provenienza (LPM) - Diritto esclusivo

LPM; Titolo primo: Marchi; Capitolo 1: Disposizioni generali

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (111 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 13 LPM · Diritto esclusivo

Il diritto al marchio conferisce al titolare il diritto esclusivo di farne uso per contraddistinguere i prodotti o i servizi per i quali il marchio è rivendicato e di disporne.

Il titolare del marchio può vietare a terzi l’uso di un segno escluso dalla protezione come marchio giusta l’articolo 3 capoverso 1; può in particolare vietare che il segno: a. sia apposto su prodotti o sul loro imballaggio; b. sia usato per offrire prodotti, metterli in commercio o detenerli a tale scopo; c. sia usato per offrire o fornire servizi; d. sia usato per importare, esportare o far transitare prodotti; e. sia apposto su documenti commerciali, usato a scopi pubblicitari o in qualsiasi altra maniera negli affari.

Il titolare del marchio gode dei diritti secondo il capoverso 2 lettera d anche quando l’importazione, l’esportazione o il transito di prodotti fabbricati a titolo commerciale avviene per scopi privati.

Il titolare del marchio gode dei diritti secondo il presente articolo anche nei confronti degli utenti autorizzati ai sensi dell’articolo 4.

← Art. 12 LPM Legge federale del 28 agosto 1992 sulla protezione dei marchi e delle indicazioni di provenienza (LPM) - Definizione Art. 14 LPM →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (110)

B-6389/2023 (Art. 13 al. 1 LPM)

Trademark Cancellation Denied Due to Insufficient Proof of Non-Use

Establishes the exclusive right of the trademark holder to use and dispose of the registered mark.

HG 2025 42 · be (Art. 13 MSchG)

Trademark Registration vs. Actual Use Preliminary Injunction Denial

Cited in relation to the exclusive right being asserted, which was examined to determine the underlying claim for the provisional measure.

HG 2022 74 · be (Art. 13 Abs. 1 MSchG)

Trademark Nullity Based on Likelihood of Confusion (Lucky Mark)

Cited in the reasoning to explain the exclusive right conferred by trademark law, but not in the dispositive.

HG 2022 74 · be (Art. 13 Abs. 2 MSchG)

Trademark Nullity Based on Likelihood of Confusion (Lucky Mark)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the right of the trademark owner to prohibit use of confusingly similar signs, but not in the dispositive.

OG.2017.00019 · gl (Art. 13 Abs. 2 lit. e MSchG)

BMW v. Former Authorized Dealer Trademark Infringement

Cited as the legal basis for prohibiting the use of signs that are excluded from trademark protection.

102 2016 243 · fr (Art. 13 al. 2 LPM)

Trademark Nullity for Non-Use Partially Granted; Likelihood of Confusion Found

Used to assess that the applicant's mark is excluded from protection due to a risk of confusion with the defendant's mark concerning class 3 products.

HSU.2023.29 · ag (Art. 13 Abs. 1 MSchG)

Solex trademark dispute: No likelihood of confusion with Sola mark

Cited as the legal basis for the exclusive right of a trademark holder to use and dispose of their mark.

HG190167 · zh (Art. 13 Abs. 2 MSchG)

Trademark Infringement and Invalidation Based on Likelihood of Confusion

Mentioned as the basis for prohibiting the use of a sign identical or similar to the prior trademark.

C/24439/2019 · ge (art. 13 al. 2 let. a LPM)

Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition in Luxury Watch Customization

Applied as the ground for declaring the defendant's use of the plaintiff's marks on modified products unlawful.

C/26421/2020 · ge (Art. 13 LPM)

Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition in Watch Modification and Co-Branding

The prohibition on using the plaintiff's marks on modified products is based on the violation of the exclusive right to use the mark conferred by this article.

C/8787/2021 · ge (art. 13 al. 2 LPM)

Trademark Owner v. Watch Competitor (Likelihood of Confusion)

Cited in the reasoning to establish that a trademark holder can prohibit the use of signs excluded from protection under Art. 3(1)(c) LPM.

HOR.2018.56 · ag (Art. 13 Abs. 2 MSchG)

Chocolate Bunny Packaging Infringement and Unfair Competition

This provision grants the right to an injunction, which is the core of the plaintiff's primary claim.

OGVE.2018.19.Nr.7 · ow (Art. 13 Abs. 1 und Abs. 2 lit. e MSchG)

Immovesta AG v. Immovest AG: Name Priority Dispute

This provision is cited to support the prohibition of the defendant from using the name 'Immovest' in Switzerland.

HOR.2019.46 · ag (Art. 13 Abs. 2 MSchG)

CELLTONE v. CELLUTONE: Trademark Infringement in Cosmetics

Cited as the legal basis for the trademark holder's right to prohibit the use of a confusingly similar trademark.

1e71b4d12ab69794137e · ag (Art. 13 Abs. 2 MSchG)

Trademark Infringement of Chocolate Easter Bunnies

Allows the trademark owner to prohibit others from using signs that are similar to the trademark and cause a likelihood of confusion.