Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
231.1 URGLDA CH

Art. 67 Legge federale del 9 ottobre 1992 sul diritto d'autore e sui diritti di protezione affini (LDA) - Violazione del diritto d’autore

LDA; Titolo quinto: Protezione giuridica; Capitolo 2: Disposizioni penali
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (112 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 67 LDA · Violazione del diritto d’autore

A querela della parte lesa, è punito con una pena detentiva fino a un anno o con una pena pecuniaria chiunque intenzionalmente e illecitamente: a. utilizza un’opera sotto una designazione falsa o diversa da quella decisa dall’autore; b. pubblica un’opera; c. modifica un’opera; d. utilizza un’opera per creare un’opera di seconda mano; e. allestisce esemplari di un’opera mediante un procedimento qualsiasi; f. offre al pubblico, aliena o mette altrimenti in circolazione esemplari di un’opera; g. recita, rappresenta o esegue un’opera direttamente o mediante un procedimento qualsiasi oppure la fa vedere o udire altrove; gbis. mette a disposizione un’opera mediante un procedimento qualsiasi in modo tale che chiunque possa accedervi dal luogo e nel momento di sua scelta; h. diffonde un’opera per radio, televisione o procedimenti analoghi, anche mediante circuiti, o la ritrasmette con impianti tecnici il cui titolare non è l’organismo di diffusione d’origine; i. fa vedere o udire un’opera messa a disposizione, diffusa o ritrasmessa; k. si rifiuta d’indicare all’autorità competente la provenienza e la quantità degli oggetti in suo possesso illecitamente fabbricati o immessi sul mercato, nonché i destinatari e l’entità delle loro ulteriori forniture ad acquirenti commerciali; l. dà in locazione un programma per computer.

Se l’autore dell’infrazione ha agito per mestiere, si procede d’ufficio. La pena è una pena detentiva fino a cinque anni o una pena pecuniaria. ...

← Art. 66a LDA Legge federale del 9 ottobre 1992 sul diritto d'autore e sui diritti di protezione affini (LDA) Art. 68 LDA →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (23)

VPB 07-0841-5919 (art. 67, al. 2, LDA)
Swiss Federal Law on Combating Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing
Cited for defining qualified product piracy as a crime.
SBK.2025.97 · ag (Art. 67 Abs. 1 lit. d URG)
Copyright Infringement and Unfair Competition Case Reinstated
Cited as the basis for potentially criminalizing the use of a work to create a second-hand work.
UE230323 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 URG)
Copyright Infringement: Corporate Ownership of Architectural Plans
This article is cited in E. II.3.1 and E. III.2, concerning preliminary offenses (Antragsdelikt).
686----------- · vd (Art. 67 al. 1 let. e et gbis LDA)
Copyright Infringement Dismissal Upheld Due to Contractual Transfer and Statute of Limitations
Although the court rejected the appeal, the ruling implies that these provisions (allegedly violated by the defendant) were the substantive grounds under consideration for the original criminal action.
BK 2022 73 · be (Art. 67 Abs. 2 URG)
Cantonal Court Orders Continuation of Investigation into Unauthorized Data Acquisition and Copyright Infringement Regarding Obituary Publication
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the penal sanction for commercial copyright infringement.
P/5722/2020 · ge (art. 67 al. 1 let. f LDA)
Prosecutor's Decision Not to Prosecute Partially Overturned on Copyright Infringement Grounds
The appeal was partially admitted specifically concerning the non-entry into proceedings regarding the violation of copyright under this article.
BK 2020 211 · be (Art. 67 Abs. 1 URG)
Company v. Public Authority Employees (Copyright/Unfair Competition Software Dispute)
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the penal provision concerning creating derivative works.
SB180248 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 lit. g URG)
R v. [Defendant's Name]: Mismanagement and Breach of Trust Conviction
The defendant was acquitted of charges under this provision, and the court noted that the decision to discontinue proceedings related to this was legally binding.
470.20.5 · bl (Art. 67 Abs. 1 URG)
Copyright and Unfair Competition Investigation Ordered, Trademark Claim Dismissed
Cited as the provision regarding the offense of copyright infringement.
D.cision.2019.801 · vd (Art. 67 al. 1 LDA)
Architect v. Co-Owners (Copyright Infringement)
The court confirms the decision to refuse to enter a ruling based on the finding that the elements constituting the offense under this article were not met, specifically the element of acting without right.
BK 2018 295 · be (Art. 67 Abs. 1 URG)
Copyright and Unfair Competition Discontinuation in Website Transfer during Bankruptcy
Cited in the reasoning concerning the penal provision for copyright infringement, specifically regarding the use of a work under a false designation or unauthorized use (also relevant for Art. 10.3).
BK 2018 295 · be (Art. 67 URG)
Copyright and Unfair Competition Discontinuation in Website Transfer during Bankruptcy
The criminal provision underlying the initial investigation, referenced when confirming that no criminal conduct was established.
BEK 2017 162 · sz (Art. 67 Abs. 1 URG)
Complainant's Appeal Dismissed for Failure to Pay Security Deposit
Provision whose violation was alleged by the appellant but was not used in the final order.
SB160193 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 lit. g URG)
Fraud, Mismanagement, and Breach of Trust Convictions Upheld, Copyright Charges Dismissed
The court decided to discontinue proceedings against the defendant for violating copyright law due to a lack of a timely and valid criminal complaint.
Jug.2011.127 · vd (art. 67 al. 1 let. b, f et h, 69 al. 1 let. e, g et i, 69a al. 1 let. a et b LDA)
Appeal Concerning Fraudulent Decoding Equipment and Unfair Competition
These articles of the Copyright Act (LDA) define the infringements regarding copyright and neighboring rights, which the court admitted for reconsideration by annulling the lower court's decision.