220
ORCO
CH
CH
Art. 67 Legge federale del 30 marzo 1911 di complemento del Codice civile svizzero (CO)
CO; Parte prima: Disposizioni generali; Titolo primo: Delle cause delle obbligazioni; Capo terzo: Delle obbligazioni derivanti da indebito arricchimento; D. Prescrizione
Art. 67 CO
L’azione di indebito arricchimento si prescrive in tre anni dal giorno in cui il danneggiato ha avuto conoscenza del suo diritto di ripetizione, ma in ogni caso in dieci anni dal giorno in cui è nato tale diritto.
Se l’arricchimento consiste in un credito verso il danneggiato, questi può rifiutarne il pagamento anche dopo prescritta l’azione d’indebito.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (167)
VVGE.1978.80.Nr.27 · ow (Art. 67 OR)
Public Law Claims for Undue Payments: Five-Year Statute of Limitations Applies
The defendant's plea of prescription was based on this article.
RBOG.1995.Nr.6 · tg (Art. 67 Abs. 1 OR)
Tenant Rent Overpayment Recovery and Knowledge of Invalidity
It governs the prescription period applicable to the claim for unjust enrichment.
A/2733/2024 · ge (art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Heirs v. Pension Fund Regarding Voided Early Withdrawal Repayment After Retroactive Disability Recognition
Used in the reasoning (6.3) to confirm that the plaintiffs acted within the prescription periods for unjust enrichment.
HG210127 · zh (Art. 67 OR)
Real Estate Development Payment Dispute and Fee Calculation
Cited regarding the statutory limitation period (Verjährungsfrist) for unjust enrichment claims.
C/8108/2021 · ge (Art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Lessee and Landlord Rent Adjustment Appeal Regarding Basement Apartment Defects and Void Initial Rent
Cited to establish the prescription period for claiming restitution of the overpaid rent.
A/2412/2023 · ge (art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Landlord Rent Overcharge Reimbursement Limitation
This article (by analogy) governed the prescription period applied to reduce the reimbursed overpaid rent amount.
KK.2021.00028 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 OR)
Claimant v. Insurer: Outstanding Sickness Benefits Dispute
Cited in the reasoning regarding the rejection of the insurer's claim for unjust enrichment (unjustified payment recall claim), but not explicitly mentioned in the final orders (dispositive).
C/8828/2022 · ge (art. 67 CO)
Tenants' Appeal Regarding Rent Guarantee Reduction and Statute of Limitations on Interest Claim
The court confirmed the decision based on the prescriptive period under this article for claims arising from unjust enrichment (restitution of undue rent payments).
A/661/2022 · ge (Art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Company v. Pension Foundation: Contribution Reimbursement and Collective Agreement Scope
Cited to reject the prescription defense raised by the defendant regarding the claim for undue contributions.
C1 21 201 · vs (art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Appeal Regarding Reimbursement of Ancillary Rental Costs Under Tenancy Law
The court examined the prescription period for the claim for unjust enrichment, which was the basis for the award.
HC.2023.343 · vd (Art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Landlord Ordered to Reimburse Overpaid Rent; Statute of Limitations Did Not Apply Due to Tenant's Lack of Knowledge
Cited in the reasoning related to the prescription of the claim for unjust enrichment, which was central to the appeal regarding the tenant's claim.
C/13346/2020 · ge (art. 67 al. 1 CO)
Landlord-Tenant Dispute Over Rent Increase Notice and Service Charge Calculation Basis
Cited in relation to the prescription period for the unjust enrichment claim before the 2020 reform.
KK.2020.00049 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 OR)
Insurer's Reimbursement Claim Dismissed Against Overlapping Insured Counterclaim for Unpaid Benefits
Cited to confirm that the claim for unjust enrichment was not time-barred.
102 2022 123 · fr (Art. 67 Abs. 1 OR)
Tenant v. Landlords: Rent Setting and Ancillary Cost Refund
Applied to determine that the claim for reimbursement of unjustly paid supplementary charges was not time-barred.
KK.2021.00007 · zh (Art. 67 Abs. 1 OR)
Insurer Recovers Fraudulently Obtained Disability Benefits
Although discussed extensively regarding prescription, it was superseded by the new law, but the claim's existence is generally framed by enrichment law principles.