220
ORCO
CH
CH
Art. 65 Legge federale del 30 marzo 1911 di complemento del Codice civile svizzero (CO)
CO; Parte prima: Disposizioni generali; Titolo primo: Delle cause delle obbligazioni; Capo terzo: Delle obbligazioni derivanti da indebito arricchimento; B. Estensione della restituzione; II. Rifusione delle spese
Art. 65 CO
Chi si è indebitamente arricchito ha diritto alla rifusione delle spese necessarie ed utili da lui incontrate; di quest’ultime però, se all’atto del ricevimento non era in buona fede, solo fino a concorrenza del maggior valore tuttora sussistente al momento della restituzione.
Egli non può pretendere indennità per altre spese, ma ha diritto, nel caso che l’indennità non gli sia offerta, di togliere, prima di restituire la cosa, ciò che vi avesse aggiunto, in quanto si possa fare senza danneggiarla.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (8)
VB.2023.00613 · zh (Art. 65 OR)
Restitution of Salary Paid to Former Teacher; Good Faith Requirement
Cited in the reasoning as the analogous private law standard for restitution of unjustified enrichment.
ZOR.2023.38 · ag (Art. 65 OR)
Buyer's Unjust Enrichment Claim Limited by Rental Profits
This provision outlines the scope of claims related to unjust enrichment.
MG160031.L · zh (Art. 65 Abs. 2 OR)
Unauthorized Subletting Profit Recovery and Investment Compensation Dispute
This article was cited in the discussion regarding the tenant's right to remove fixtures (ius tollendi) before returning the rented property.
11.2003.27 · ti (art. 65 cpv. 1 CO)
Relationship Dissolution: Gift Return, Property Co-ownership, and Financial Reimbursement Appeal
Cited in the reasoning as the correct standard (over Art. 206 CC) for determining reimbursement for useful expenses incurred by the good-faith party, which determined the adjustment to the award in order 1.3 and 5.
ZF 2006 3 · gr (Art. 65 OR)
Restitution for Void Sale Due to Lack of Agricultural Authorization
The court considered and dismissed the claim for reimbursement of necessary and useful expenses based on this article, ultimately applying Art. 939 ZGB instead.
ZF 2006 3 · gr (Art. 65 OR)
Appeal Regarding Restitution After Void Real Estate Sale Due to Lack of Agricultural Permit
Mentioned in the context of expenses for necessary and useful improvements, but ultimately determined to be inapplicable as the dispute concerned monetary claims, not the return of the property itself.
11.2003.27 · ti (art. 65 cpv. 1 CO)
Engagement Breakup: Gift Restitution, Income Division of Co-owned Property, and Construction Cost Allocation
Used as the applicable rule for reimbursement of necessary and useful expenses incurred by the party receiving the returned gift (CO 1).
35.2018.62 · ti (Art. 65 CO 1)
Worker v. Insurer: Permanent Stabilization of Work Injury
Applied implicitly by the final order, as the appeal was rejected and costs were set against the State (not the appellant), consistent with the Cantonal Tribunal regulations regarding appeal outcomes.