Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
220 ORCO CH

Art. 62 Legge federale del 30 marzo 1911 di complemento del Codice civile svizzero (CO)

CO; Parte prima: Disposizioni generali; Titolo primo: Delle cause delle obbligazioni; Capo terzo: Delle obbligazioni derivanti da indebito arricchimento; A. Condizioni; I. In genere
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (1,685 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 62 CO

Chi senza causa legittima si trovi arricchito a danno dell’altrui patrimonio, è tenuto a restituire l’arricchimento.

Si fa luogo alla restituzione specialmente di ciò che fu dato o prestato senza valida causa, o per una causa non avveratasi o che ha cessato di sussistere.

← Art. 61 CO Legge federale del 30 marzo 1911 di complemento del Codice civile svizzero (CO) Art. 63 CO →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (493)

BGE 151 III 95 (Art. 62 OR)
Copyright infringement of applied art: high bar to prove bad faith for disgorgement under unauthorized agency when cease-and-desist letter does not substantiate the claim.
Basis for the unjust enrichment claim, which was the only remaining remedy and supported the lower court's order against the defendants.
10/2015/2 · sh (Art. 62 OR)
Director's Self-Dealing Voids Property Sale and Lease Agreement
Basis for the successful claim against the appellant for repayment of unjust enrichment arising from the void lease agreement.
A/2777/2016 · ge (art. 62 CO)
State Personnel Office v. Former Employee: Repayment of Undue Salary Payments
Basis for holding the appellant liable to reimburse salaries received without a legal cause, as part of the general principle of unjust enrichment applied in public law.
A/1185/2015 · ge (art. 62 et ss CO)
Teacher Repayment of Work Incapacity Indemnities Upheld
The demand for restitution of unduly paid treatment was based on the provisions concerning unjust enrichment.
A/3066/2014 · ge (art. 62 CO)
Public Employee Dismissal and Salary Reimbursement Dispute
Used as the general principle for unjust enrichment, forming the basis for the obligation to repay, which was subsequently overturned.
MG130015.L.U · zh (Art. 62 Abs. 1 OR)
Lessee's Unauthorized Use of Parking Constitutes Unjust Enrichment
This article establishes the obligation to restitute unjust enrichment, which forms the basis for the court's finding.
CDP.2024.90 · ne (Art. 62 CO)
Administrative Service v. Former Provisional Employee (Restitution of Unjustified Salary)
Cited as the specific article defining undue enrichment, justifying the order to restitute the unduly received payment.
CDP.2024.90 · ne (Art. 62 ss CO)
Administrative Service v. Former Provisional Employee (Restitution of Unjustified Salary)
Cited as the rules applied *mutatis mutandis* for the claim of undue enrichment when specific administrative law provisions are lacking.
ZK1 2024 26 · sz (Art. 62 Abs. 1 OR)
Real Estate Occupancy Dispute: Formality of Gratuitous Use Agreement
The court dismissed the claim because there was no unjustified enrichment (Art. 62 Abs. 1 OR) due to the existence of the loan agreement.
BV.2025.00023 · zh (Art. 62 OR)
Pension Fund v. Heir (Unjust Enrichment Recovery)
This article on unjustified enrichment serves as the substantive basis for ordering the defendant to repay the unjustified payments.
A/2733/2024 · ge (art. 62 de la loi fédérale du 30 mars 1911, complétant le Code civil suisse (CO - RS 220))
Heirs v. Pension Fund Regarding Voided Early Withdrawal Repayment After Retroactive Disability Recognition
The basis for the request for restitution due to unjust enrichment (6.2).
HOR.2024.53 · ag (Art. 62 Abs. 2 OR)
Unjust Enrichment Claim for Void Real Estate Reservation Agreement
Used to justify the claim for reimbursement of the down payment based on unjust enrichment.
KV.Z.2023.1 · sg (Art. 62 ff. OR)
Claimant v. Health Insurer on Sickness Benefits and Business Activity
Cited as the general legal basis for restitution due to unjust enrichment, which underlies the decision to dismiss the counterclaim (Order 2).
C/10439/2020 · ge (Art. 62 al. 1 CO)
Employee Dismissal Justified by Undisclosed Conviction; Liability of Successor Employer Overturned
Cited when discussing the claim by A/B SA for the repayment of the wrongly paid bonus.
C/25783/2022 · ge (art. 62 CO)
Lessee Reimbursement for Rent Payments After Settlement: Procedural Deficiency in Proof
The provision was mentioned in the lower court's reasoning (which was analyzed during the appeal), but the appellate court's final order dismisses the claim based on procedural flaws, not the substantive basis (Art. 62 CO) cited by the lower court. Therefore, it is excluded based on the rule that only provisions used in the final orders are included.