Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
220 ORCO CH

Art. 579 Legge federale del 30 marzo 1911 di complemento del Codice civile svizzero (CO)

CO; Parte terza: Delle società commerciali e della società cooperativa ; Titolo ventesimoquarto: Della società in nome collettivo; Capo quarto: Scioglimento della società e uscita dei soci; C. Uscita di soci; IV. Quando vi siano due soci
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (1,685 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 579 CO

Quando vi siano soltanto due soci, quegli tra essi che non ha dato alcun motivo allo scioglimento può, nelle medesime circostanze, continuare l’impresa per conto proprio, rimborsando all’altro quanto gli spetta nel patrimonio sociale.

Lo stesso può ordinarsi dal giudice, quando lo scioglimento sia chiesto per un motivo grave riguardante precipuamente la persona di uno dei soci.

← Art. 578 CO Legge federale del 30 marzo 1911 di complemento del Codice civile svizzero (CO) Art. 580 CO →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (9)

C/3369/2014 · ge (Art. 579 al. 1 CO)
Corporate Succession and Improper Appeal in Intervention
Cited to explain the legal consequence of one partner continuing the business after dissolution, relevant to the continuity of liability.
12.2012.147 · ti (art. 579 cpv. 1 CO)
Former Partner Liquidation Dispute and Continuation of Business
This article was the main ground used to reject the appeal against the decision not to declare the initial action inadmissible, confirming that the sole shareholder could continue the business individually.
AP.2011.93 · vd (Art. 579 CO)
Partnership Continuation and Property Transfer Dispute
This article on the continuation of business by the non-culpable associate was applied to allow the defendant (the respondent) to continue the partnership's business.
ML.2010.31 · vd (Art. 579 CO)
Debt Enforcement Appeal Rejection: Successor Liability for Ceded Debt
Mentioned in the reasoning to justify the continuation of the business and the debtor's liability, but it is not explicitly cited in the final dispositive orders (I-IV).
12.2008.96 · ti (art. 579 CO)
Partnership Dissolution and Asset Distribution Dispute
This provision establishes the rule applied to the continuation of the company's activity by the remaining partner after the dissolution of the two-person partnership, which is the core legal situation addressed in the partial acceptance of the appeal.
PS.2005.0299 · vd (Art. 579 CO)
Repayment of Short-Time Work Benefits by Successor Sole Proprietorship
Although cited in the reasoning to establish the continuing debtor, this article was not explicitly cited in the final orders (I, II, III) to justify the rejection of the appeal, thus it is excluded based on the rules.
ZF 2002 51 · gr (Art. 579 OR)
Appellate Court Upholds Dismissal of Cohabitation Dissolution Claims Related to Partnership Liquidation
Mentioned in the reasoning when discussing the possibility of asset transfer (assumed to be part of the rejected contractual agreement for the Fr. 20'000 claim).
12.2000.153 · ti (art. 579 cpv. 1 CO)
Partner Goodwill Refund Dispute
This article, concerning the rights of the remaining partner continuing the business, is cited in the reasoning leading to the final orders, although the core decision relies on its implications regarding the division of social assets.
12.2012.147 · ti (art. 579 cpv. 1 CO)
Physiotherapist Partnership Dissolution and Direct Monetary Claim Admissibility
This article was central to the decision regarding the continuation of the enterprise by one partner after the dissolution of the two-partner collective company, as confirmed in order 3.