Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
220 ORCO CH

Art. 28 Legge federale del 30 marzo 1911 di complemento del Codice civile svizzero (CO)

CO; Parte prima: Disposizioni generali; Titolo primo: Delle cause delle obbligazioni; Capo primo: Delle obbligazioni derivanti da contratto; F. Vizi del contratto; II. Dolo
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (1,685 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 28 CO

La parte, che fu indotta al contratto per dolo dell’altra, non è obbligata, quand’anche l’errore non fosse essenziale.

Se la parte fu indotta al contratto per dolo d’una terza persona, il contratto è obbligatorio, a meno che l’altra parte al momento del contratto abbia conosciuto o dovuto conoscere il dolo.

← Art. 27 CO Legge federale del 30 marzo 1911 di complemento del Codice civile svizzero (CO) Art. 29 CO →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (166)

60/2015/43 · sh (Art. 28 ff. OR)
Wildlife Damage Assessment Settlement Validity Challenge
Cited in the context of assessing whether the representative's agreement was vitiated by undue pressure or deceit, which was necessary to evaluate the validity of the settlement agreement.
C/5778/2021 · ge (art. 28 CO)
Seller's Fraudulent Misrepresentation Voids Real Estate Contract
The appeal was rejected because the court confirmed the lower court's finding that the appellant committed fraud (dol) under this article, justifying the invalidation of the contract.
ZVE.2024.45 · ag (Art. 28 OR)
Tenant's Appeal on Commercial Property Costs Dismissed Due to Prior Settlement Agreement
Addresses intentional misrepresentation as a cause for a contract to be non-binding.
ZSU.2024.173 · ag (Art. 28 Abs. 1 OR)
Provisional Enforcement of Debt Upheld Despite Allegations of Misrepresentation
This provision deals with contracts induced by intentional misrepresentation or deception, which the debtor invoked as a defense.
C/2965/2021 · ge (Art. 28 al. 1 CO)
Appeal Regarding Purchase Price Payment for Medical Practice Based on Alleged Fraud
Cited in the reasoning to dismiss the appealer's claim to invalidate the contract for deceit (dol).
C/2314/2019 · ge (art. 28 CO)
Lessor v. Lessee: Rent Arrears and Contract Validity
Cited concerning the ground of fraud (dol) for contract invalidation.
HG210167 · zh (Art. 28 Abs. 1 OR)
Plaintiff v. Bank Regarding Unauthorized Account Debits
Used to state that a contract is not binding if the person was induced to conclude it by intentional deception, even if the mistake was not essential.
HG210167 · zh (Art. 28 Abs. 2 OR)
Plaintiff v. Bank Regarding Unauthorized Account Debits
Used to state the conditions under which intentional deception by a third party affects the binding nature of the contract for the deceived party.
HG240031 · zh (Art. 28 OR)
Investment Premium Repayment and Breach of Warranty Claim
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the claimant's main claim, which was ultimately rejected (E. 3.2).
A/2396/2023 · ge (art. 28 al. 1 CO)
Registration Duty Liability on Voidable Real Estate Option Agreement
Cited in the reasoning to explain the effect of dolus (fraud) on a contract.
ZB.2024.23 · bs (Art. 28 OR)
Tenant Eviction Reversed Due to Revoked Agent Mandates
Cited in the reasoning regarding potential grounds for nullifying the power of attorney revocation due to fraudulent misrepresentation.
HG200263 · zh (Art. 28 Abs. 1 OR)
Claimant v. Defendant: Mini Future Transaction Dispute and Apparent Authority Ruling
Cited in connection with the defendant's potential claim regarding fraudulent inducement concerning the Mini Future ISIN CH 3 contract.
ZK2 2023 6 · gr (Art. 28 OR)
Appeal Dismissed Due to Procedural Failure and Finding of Intentional Deception in Insurance Claim
The court confirmed that the lower court correctly applied the principle of the invalidity of the agreement due to intentional deception, referencing this article in relation to the VVG.
ZOR.2023.17 · ag (Art. 28 OR)
Seller's Misrepresentation of Damaged Motorhome as "New" Voids Sale
The court used this article to establish that the contract was unilaterally non-binding for the plaintiff due to intentional deception.
AC/163/2018 · ge (art. 28 al. 1 CO)
Legal Aid Denial Overturned in Settlement Validity Challenge
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the conditions for vitiation by fraudulent misrepresentation (dol) in contract law, which is relevant to the underlying dispute, although the final order only addresses the appeal on legal aid.