220
ORCO
CH
Art. 273a Legge federale del 30 marzo 1911 di complemento del Codice civile svizzero (CO)
CO; Parte seconda: Dei singoli contratti; Titolo ottavo: Della locazione; Capo terzo: Della protezione dalle disdette in materia di locazione di locali d’abitazione e commerciali; D. Abitazioni familiari
Art. 273a CO
Se la cosa locata funge da abitazione familiare, anche il coniuge del conduttore può contestare la disdetta, chiedere la protrazione della locazione ed esercitare tutti gli altri diritti che competono al conduttore in caso di disdetta.
Le convenzioni concernenti la protrazione della locazione sono valide soltanto se concluse con ambedue i coniugi.
Il presente articolo si applica per analogia ai partner registrati.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (14)
HC.2022.306 · vd (art. 271, 272, 273, 273a CO)
Landlord v. Tenants (Eviction for Rent and Parking Fees)
Cited in the facts section regarding the tenants' request for conciliation and extension of the lease, but *not* explicitly in the final orders (Dispositif I-VII).
OG.2016.00033 · gl (Art. 273a Abs. 1 OR)
Appeal Regarding Retaliatory Eviction and Tenant Protection Violations
This article of the Swiss Civil Code is cited to establish that a spouse of a tenant can also exercise tenant rights for a family dwelling.
MB160019.L · zh (Art. 273a OR)
Surviving Spouse's Right to Challenge Lease Termination of Family Residence
The article that directly establishes the surviving spouse's standing to request an extension of the tenancy.
102 2016 112 · fr (Art. 273a al. 1 CO)
Spousal Appearance Sufficient for Tenant Appeal Against Lease Termination
The court based its decision to admit the appeal and annul the previous ruling on the right of a non-tenant spouse to contest the termination of a family dwelling lease.
2015.11.10.zr.2 · bl (Art. 273a OR)
Tenant Renovation Compensation Dispute
Cited to highlight the lack of specific legal protection for a spouse not party to the lease in cases of rent reduction disputes, unlike in termination disputes.
410.15.142 · bl (Art. 273a OR)
Tenant Renovation Compensation Dispute
Cited to note the lack of specific protection for a non-contracting spouse in disputes over inconvenience compensation, unlike in termination cases.
HC.2015.428 · vd (Art. 273a al. 1 CO)
Co-Tenant vs. Employment-Linked Housing Termination
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the scope of tenant protection in interdependent contracts, which supports the rejection of the appeal regarding the tenant's rights.
HC.2015.328 · vd (Art. 273a al. 2 CO)
Tenant Spouse Consent Required for Lease Extension Settlement
Basis for nullity of the judicial settlement because it was concluded without the consent of the non-tenant spouse.
CACIV.2012.49 · ne (Art. 273a CO)
Liquidation Status Bars Appeal Over Commercial Lease Termination
Cited in the reasoning as an exception to the rule that only the tenant can request the cancellation of a notice of termination (family housing case, which is not applicable here).
HC.2012.556 · vd (Art. 273a al. 1 CO)
Tenant Eviction Upheld Despite Humanitarian Grounds Claim
Cited to establish the standing of the spouse to contest the termination and exercise tenant rights when the dwelling serves as a family home.
LF110097 · zh (Art. 273a OR)
Bankruptcy Administrator's Eviction Power Over Bankrupt Debtor Upheld Despite Successful Appeal by Child
Cited in the reasoning concerning the procedural rights of the spouse regarding the family home, although the final order's grounds are procedural.
CCC.2001.170 · ne (Art. 273a CO)
Tenant Eviction Upheld Despite Late Set-Off Claim
Cited by the lower court judge to confirm the lawful termination of the lease agreement, which justifies the eviction.
11 98 82 · lu (Art. 273a OR)
Agricultural Lease Termination Protection vs. Family Dwelling Tenancy Law Analogy
Cited in the reasoning to discuss the non-applicability of family apartment provisions to agricultural leases.
MB160019 · zh (Art. 273a OR)
Surviving Spouse's Exclusive Right to Challenge Lease Termination for Family Dwelling
The court explicitly found the surviving spouse legitimized to request the extension of the tenancy based on this article (E. 3.2.7).