220
ORCO
CH
CH
Art. 100 Legge federale del 30 marzo 1911 di complemento del Codice civile svizzero (CO)
CO; Parte prima: Disposizioni generali; Titolo secondo: Degli effetti delle obbligazioni; Capo secondo: Conseguenze dell’inadempimento; A. Inadempimento; II. Misura della responsabilità ed estensione del risarcimento; 2. Patto di esclusione della responsabilità
Art. 100 CO
È nullo il patto avente per scopo di liberare preventivamente dalla responsabilità dipendente da dolo o da colpa grave.
Anche la preventiva rinuncia alla responsabilità dipendente da colpa leggera può essere considerata nulla, secondo il prudente criterio del giudice, qualora al momento della rinuncia la parte rinunciante fosse al servizio dell’altra o qualora la responsabilità consegua dall’esercizio di una industria sottoposta a pubblica concessione.
Rimangono riservate le disposizioni particolari sul contratto di assicurazione.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (50)
I 2025 5 · sz (Art. 100 OR)
Claimant v. Insurer: Sickness Benefits Dispute Over Conflicting Medical Evidence
Cited in the reasoning (8.1) regarding the limits of contractual agreements on default, which is relevant to the interest calculation in order 1.
C/7286/2021 · ge (art. 100 al. 1 CO)
Bank Liability for Unauthorized Asset Manager Transactions Despite Contractual Clauses
The risk transfer clause is void if the bank is at fault due to intent or gross negligence.
C/7286/2021 · ge (art. 100 al. 2 CO)
Bank Liability for Unauthorized Asset Manager Transactions Despite Contractual Clauses
Allows the judge to nullify a clause exonerating the bank for slight negligence if banking activity is deemed a concessioned industry.
C/7286/2021 · ge (art. 100 et 101 al. 3 CO)
Bank Liability for Unauthorized Asset Manager Transactions Despite Contractual Clauses
Applicable by analogy to examine the validity of the risk transfer clause concerning bank liability.
A/4575/2018 · ge (art. 100 al. 1 CO)
Claimant v. Insurer: Sickness Indemnity Benefits Dispute Following Invalid Psychiatric Assessment
Cited in connection with the enforcement of Art. 41 LCA regarding maturity.
HC.2023.363 · vd (Art. 100 CO)
Supplier Liability for Outdoor Storage Rack Corrosion and Negligent Consultation
Used to dismiss the appellant's argument concerning the liability exclusion clause, as the serious negligence found renders it void.
SV.2022.00001 · zh (Art. 100 OR)
Insurer v. Entity: Arbitrator Recusal Based on Parallel Liability Exposure
Mentioned in the reasoning but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (Rule for exclusion applies). The only cited procedural rule related to appeal is BGG, not OR.
HG 2020 126 · be (Art. 100 Abs. 1 OR)
Negligent Bank Liability and Contributory Customer Fault in Fraudulent Withdrawals
Cited as the relevant provision limiting the possibility to waive liability for intent or gross negligence, which was relevant in determining the risk transfer.
2021.03.04.sv.1 · bl (Art. 100 Abs. 1 OR)
Claimant's Fraudulent Swinger Club Activities Justify Benefit Termination and Reimbursement
This article stipulates the obligation to pay default interest on outstanding monetary debts.
C/13495/2016 · ge (Art. 100 al. 1 CO)
Bank Liability for Unauthorized Wire Transfers Despite Risk Clause
Cited in the context of the invalidity of the risk transfer clause due to the bank's gross negligence (which was found to have occurred).
12.2017.74 · ti (art. 100 cpv. 1 CO)
Client v. Bank: Unauthorized Transfers and Bank Negligence
Used to invalidate the contractual clause transferring the loss to the appellant due to the respondent's gross negligence.
LB170004 · zh (Art. 100 Abs. 2 OR)
Agency v. Bank: Restitution of Unauthorized Funds Withdrawal
Cited in the reasoning concerning the limitations on the exclusion of liability for slight negligence in General Terms and Conditions (AGB).
LB170004 · zh (Art. 100 OR)
Agency v. Bank: Restitution of Unauthorized Funds Withdrawal
Cited in the reasoning regarding the scope of liability exclusion clauses in the bank's GTCs.
NP170024 · zh (Art. 100 Abs. 1, 192 Abs. 3 und 199 OR)
Co-Owner Damages Claim Dismissed Due to Withdrawal of Judicial Expert Request
Cited in the contract's warranty clause (Art. 1.3 [9]) which the court considered when interpreting the contractual provisions in section 6.
C/5493/2014 · ge (art. 100 al. 1 CO applicable par analogie)
Bank Liability for Fraudulent Wire Transfers Despite Liability Limitation Clause
Mentioned within the reasoning for why a contractual liability limitation clause is excluded in case of gross negligence (which the court found to be present).