210
ZGBCC
CH
CH
Art. 927 Codice civile svizzero (CC)
CC; Parte terza: Del possesso e del registro fondiario; Titolo ventesimoquarto: Del possesso; C. Effetti; I. Protezione del possesso; 2. Azione di reintegra
Art. 927 CC
Chi ha tolto altrui una cosa con atti di illecita violenza è tenuto a restituirla, ancorché pretenda avere sulla medesima un diritto prevalente.
Non è tenuto a restituire la cosa il convenuto che giustifica immediatamente un diritto prevalente in virtù del quale egli potrebbe subito ritoglierla all’attore.
L’azione ha per oggetto la restituzione della cosa ed il risarcimento del danno.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (34)
ZR1 2024 4 · gr (Art. 927 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Dispute Over Leasehold Property Rights and Fire Alarm Access
The appeal was rejected because the appellant failed to prove a better right to the disputed premises, as required by this article for the defendant to refuse return in a possessory action.
C/9605/2024 · ge (art. 927 al. 1 CC)
Management Contract Dispute and Provisional Restitution Denial
Cited in the reasoning when analyzing the nature and scope of possessory actions, which relates to the underlying claim for repossession.
C/1148/2022 · ge (Art. 927 al. 2 CC)
Subtenant Possession Restoration Upheld Against Landlord's Preferential Claim
The court confirmed the lower court's decision because the appellant did not demonstrate a superior right (droit préférable) under this article to retake possession of the premises from the respondent.
CG190018 · zh (Art. 927 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Share Ownership Dispute Following Conditional Call Option Exercise
Allows the owner to reclaim possession of their movable property.
CG190018 · zh (Art. 927 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Share Ownership Dispute Following Conditional Call Option Exercise
States that the possessor can invoke a better right to the property.
HC.2020.244 · vd (Art. 927 al. 1 CC)
Property Eviction Provisional Measure Appeal: Unsanitary Conditions and Urgency
This article, concerning the possessory action (action réintégrande), underpins the main claim rejected by the appeal.
C/14275/2019 · ge (Art. 927 CC)
Possessory Action for Sub-lessee Against Landlord for Lockout
The court confirmed the lower court's decision based on the applicability of this article concerning possessory actions.
102 2018 107 · fr (art. 927 al. 1 CC)
Property Owner Possessory Action Against Successor Tenant Farmer
This article defining the reintegrand action was the primary legal basis for the Federal Supreme Court's earlier decision, framing the conditions the Cantonal Court needed to re-examine.
C/10750/2018 · ge (art. 927 CC)
Appeal Regarding Refusal of Provisional Restitution of Commercial Premises
Cited in the reasoning regarding the applicants' assertion about the protection of possession, which the court dismissed as irrelevant to the jurisdiction of the tenancy court.
11.2016.133 · ti (art. 927 cpv. 2 CC)
Property Owners v. Adjacent Property Owners (Possessory Action for Obstruction of Servitude)
Cited in the reasoning (point 6c) contrasting the maintenance action with the restitution action by noting that the defendant cannot assert a superior right.
102 2016 212 · fr (art. 927 CC)
Owner Lacks Standing for Possessory Action; Fails to Show Urgency for Provisional Measures
The court rejected the appeal because the appellant could not rely on the possessory action (réintégrande) under this article as he never had possession of the property.
C/23666/2015 · ge (art. 927 al. 1 CC)
Oral Lease Dispute and Possessory Claim Regarding Gas Station
Cited in the reasoning as the basis for the possessory action, and implicitly used to reject the claim because the conditions (usurpation by defendants) were not met.
C/23666/2015 · ge (art. 927 al. 2 CC)
Oral Lease Dispute and Possessory Claim Regarding Gas Station
Cited in the reasoning as an exception to the reintegranda action, where the defendant immediately establishes a preferable right.
101 2015 126 · fr (Art. 927 CC)
Municipality Repossession Case Over Contested Land Use and Appeal Admissibility
The court modified the lower court's decision by declaring the initial claim inadmissible, which was based on this article concerning the action for repossession.
TDMAR C1 13 212 · vs (art. 927 CC)
Restitution of Cow and Liability of Possessor in Bad Faith
Cited in the reasoning regarding the scope of application of Art. 938 ss CC, but not in the dispositive orders 1-4.