210
ZGBCC
CH
CH
Art. 693 Codice civile svizzero (CC)
CC; Parte prima: Della proprietà; Titolo diciannovesimo: Della proprietà fondiaria; Capo secondo: Elementi e limiti della proprietà fondiaria; B. Restrizioni; III. Rapporti di vicinato; 6. Condotte; c. Cambiamento di circostanze
Art. 693 CC
Modificandosi le circostanze, il gravato può pretendere uno spostamento della condotta conforme ai propri interessi.
Le spese dello spostamento devono, di regola, essere sopportate dall’avente diritto.
Dove ciò sia giustificato da speciali circostanze un’equa parte delle spese può però essere posta a carico del gravato.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (15)
ZZ.1985.24 · so (Art. 693 ZGB)
Property Owner Compensation for Public Utility Fixtures on Private Land
Analogous principle mentioned regarding the relocation of facilities when land use changes, informing the court's decision on assessing current use.
A-3425/2016 (Art. 693 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Landowners' Challenge to Power Line Easement Renewal Dismissed
Allows landowners to demand the relocation of a high-voltage line under certain circumstances.
7H 15 178 · lu (Art. 693 ZGB)
Landowner Sewage Fee Waiver Invalid Due to Lack of Equivalent Consideration
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the right to relocate the pipeline, but not explicitly used in the final orders.
VVGE.2009.10.Nr.6 · ow (Art. 693 ZGB)
Concession Holder Pipeline Relocation Dispute
Claims based on this provision must be brought before the civil court, and the municipality cannot rely on it as it is not the burdened property owner.
AbR.1988.89.Nr.14 · ow (Art. 693 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Contractor's Claim for Extra Work Upheld Due to Owner's Implied Authorization
This provision addresses the general rule that the beneficiary of a pipeline should bear the costs of its laying, which is relevant to the discussion of who ultimately should pay for the work, though not directly decisive for the claim against the defendant.
A-5014/2013 (Art. 693 ZGB)
Telecommunications Company v. Property Owners: Eminent Domain for Underground Cable Upheld
This provision likely pertains to building prohibitions or restrictions on land use.
HC.2014.645 · vd (Art. 693 CC)
Boundary Dispute and Damages Appeal Over Tree Interference and Path Modification
Although cited in reasoning regarding the displacement of conduits, it was not explicitly cited in the final orders (dispositive I-V).
A-459/2011 (Art. 693 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Electricity Act Alters Expropriation Claim, Mandates Permit Application
Refers to the possibility of requesting the relocation of a servitude.
A-4676/2007 (Art. 693 ZGB)
Sewer Line Easement Expropriation Upheld
This provision, which provides for a right of relocation in connection with neighborly rights for conduits, does not create an inalienable right for the landowner that cannot be overridden by expropriation.
10.2005.9.1 · ti (art. 693 CC)
Expropriation for Sewage Easement Upheld Despite Owner Opposition
Cited in the reasoning to note that the proprietor may request the relocation of the conduit at the Municipality's expense if it obstructs a concrete building project.
CC.2004.42 · ne (Art. 693 CC)
Property Owner v. Municipality: Water Pipe Relocation Costs
Cited in the reasoning concerning the rejection of the defense based on tacit acceptance, grounding the court's analysis of the costs allocation.
CC.2004.42 · ne (Art. 693 al.1 CC)
Property Owner v. Municipality: Water Pipe Relocation Costs
This article established the general rule that the owner of the burdened property can demand the relocation of installations, which is the core basis for the plaintiff's claim.
CC.2004.42 · ne (Art. 693 al.3 CC)
Property Owner v. Municipality: Water Pipe Relocation Costs
This provision was used to justify charging the plaintiff (the burdened owner) with 20% of the relocation costs based on special circumstances.
11.1998.155 · ti (art. 693 cpv. 1 CC)
Property Owner Denied Easement for Sewage Line Installation
Cited in the reasoning regarding the right to demand the relocation of the pipeline if circumstances change, impacting the cost assessment for the main ground (Art. 691 CC).
AC.1998.0056 · vd (art. 693 CC)
Landowners v. Denial of Permits for Gravel Extraction and Terrain Alteration
Cited in the reasoning section to explain that the owner of the burdened property can demand the relocation of installations, which invalidates the public interest argument used to deny the permit.