210
ZGBCC
CH
CH
Art. 684 Codice civile svizzero (CC)
CC; Parte prima: Della proprietà; Titolo diciannovesimo: Della proprietà fondiaria; Capo secondo: Elementi e limiti della proprietà fondiaria; B. Restrizioni; III. Rapporti di vicinato; 1. Eccessi pregiudizievoli
Art. 684 CC
Usando del diritto di proprietà, e specialmente esercitando sul suo fondo un’industria, ognuno è obbligato di astenersi da ogni eccesso pregiudicevole alla proprietà del vicino.
Sono vietati in particolare l’inquinamento dell’aria, i cattivi odori, i rumori, i suoni, gli scotimenti, le radiazioni e la privazione di insolazione o di luce diurna che sono di danno ai vicini e non sono giustificati dalla situazione e destinazione dei fondi o dall’uso locale.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (295)
VVGE.1995.96.Nr.36 · ow (Art. 684 ZGB)
Supervisory Board Complaint Dismissal and Third-Party Appeal Rights
Cited as a basis for civil action regarding excessive neighboring emissions, which is an alternative avenue for the complainants.
BZ.2007.58 · sg (Art. 684 ZGB)
Excessive Light Deprivation Nuisance Trumps Cantonal Setback Compliance
This provision defines excessive immissions and is the main legal basis for ordering the felling of specific trees.
VWBES.2007.104 · so (Art. 684 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Zoning Conformity for Mixed-Use Project with Social Services
Cited to discuss the legal treatment of ideal immissions, specifically drug dealing and injecting, in neighboring properties.
TVR.2002.Nr.11 · tg (Art. 684 ZGB)
Public Construction Compliance and Private Nuisance Abatement
The court dismissed the appeal concerning the private law claim based on this provision.
RBOG.1996.Nr.2 · tg (Art. 684 ff. ZGB)
Appellate Court Clarifies Distinction Between Public Law Administrative Decisions and Private Law Easement Enforcement in Setback Dispute
Cited in the main heading as the relevant area of law governing the neighborhood dispute regarding setback regulations.
ZZ.1991.4 · so (Art. 684 ZGB)
Animal Shelter Noise Nuisance and Property Rights Injunction
The specific provision defining the prohibition of excessive immissions, which describes the essential element of exceeding property rights under Art. 679 ZGB.
A-4914/2023 (Art. 684 ZGB)
Aircraft Noise Compensation for Property Value Loss
Deals with neighbourly obligations and duties, relevant for assessing the excessiveness of immissions in expropriation cases.
A-5274/2023 (Art. 684 ZGB)
Property Value Diminution Due to Airport Overflights and Noise Pollution
Deals with the duty to tolerate excessive immissions.
A-4710/2023 (Art. 684 ZGB)
Airport Noise Compensation Claim Denied
Deals with immissions that exceed the normal level and are therefore not to be tolerated.
B.2024.103 · sg (Art. 684 ZGB)
Violation of Hearing Rights Due to Improper Building Permit Notification
Cited as the basis for private law objections concerning excessive impact on foreign property, relevant to Art. 154 PBG.
ZKBES.2024.40 · so (Art. 684 ZGB)
Property Owner Appeals Injunction Against Noise-Emitting Cat Repellent Devices
The court upheld the lower court's decision regarding the nuisance caused by the ultrasonic devices under the provision concerning excessive influence on property.
ZVE.2023.7 · ag (Art. 684 ZGB)
Tree Removal Order Affirmed, Pre-Funding Requirement Removed
Cited in the context of whether provisions of Art. 679/684 ZGB are applicable in neighborly plant law.
VWBES.2024.29 · so (Art. 684 ZGB)
Neighbors v. Building Permit for Chicken Coop with Rooster
The court addressed the appellants' invocation of this civil law provision regarding neighborly protection, clarifying that public law remedies were sufficient for this case.
101 2023 456 · fr (Art. 684 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Cowbell Noise Restriction Appeal and Burden of Proof
Although cited in the reasoning, it is not explicitly mentioned in the final orders (Dispositiv).
23.6201 · sg (Art. 684 ZGB)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit for Roof Addition and Parking Due to Significant Strengthening of Existing Forest Setback Violations
The court decided to leave open whether the project would also lead to excessive emissions under Art. 684 ZGB, as the primary ground under Art. 109 PBG was sufficient to overturn the decision.