210
ZGBCC
CH
CH
Art. 676 Codice civile svizzero (CC)
CC; Parte prima: Della proprietà; Titolo diciannovesimo: Della proprietà fondiaria; Capo secondo: Elementi e limiti della proprietà fondiaria; A. Elementi; III. Costruzioni sul fondo; 4. Condotte
Art. 676 CC
Le condotte di allacciamento che si trovano fuori del fondo a cui servono fanno parte dell’impianto da cui provengono o a cui conducono e appartengono al proprietario di questo, salvo disposizione contraria.
La costituzione di tali diritti reali sui fondi altrui ha luogo a titolo di servitù, in quanto non siano applicabili le norme sui rapporti di vicinato.
La servitù nasce con la costruzione della condotta se questa è riconoscibile esteriormente. In caso contrario essa nasce con l’iscrizione nel registro fondiario.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (31)
A-6709/2024 (art. 676 CC)
CFE Expropriation: Indefinite Servitude for Power Line Affirmed
This provision governs the creation and nature of pipeline servitudes, which was central to the court's decision on the duration and inscription of the rights in question.
600.2024.72 · bl (Art. 676 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Sewer Line Relocation Costs: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Unregistered Rights
The court used this provision to establish that conduits serving disposal and supply, located outside the property they serve, belong to the owner of the plant from which they originate or to which they are routed.
600.2024.72 · bl (Art. 676 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Sewer Line Relocation Costs: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Unregistered Rights
The court referenced this provision regarding the encumbrance of foreign properties with conduits through the establishment of a servitude, unless neighbor law applies.
600.2024.72 · bl (Art. 676 Abs. 3 Satz 1 ZGB)
Sewer Line Relocation Costs: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Unregistered Rights
The court used this provision to determine that the external perceptibility of the conduit was not met, thus not allowing for its creation outside the land register.
600.2024.72 · bl (Art. 676 Abs. 3 Satz 2 ZGB)
Sewer Line Relocation Costs: Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over Unregistered Rights
The court used this provision to establish that the conduit servitude only arises upon registration in the land register when the external perceptibility is absent.
4.DV.2018.6 · ag (Art. 676 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Municipality v. Property Owners: Public Utility Determination of Water Pipe
Referred to in the reasoning, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
4.DV.2018.4 · ag (Art. 676 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Property Owner Responsible for Private Sewer Line Repairs
Cited in the reasoning regarding property ownership of pipelines, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.
CC 2017 97 · ju (art. 676 al. 3 CC)
Pipeline Installation Upheld Despite Permit and Safety Concerns
Cited to determine whether the servitude was validly constituted due to the apparent nature of the gas pipeline station.
A-5940/2016 (Art. 676 Abs. 3 ZGB)
Power Line Easement Expropriation Upheld Despite Lack of Original Documentation
Cited to explain that a right of passage servitude is established with the creation of the line, replacing the land register entry as a means of publicity.
11.2016.74 · ti (art. 676 cpv. 3 CC)
Terrace Servitude Violation and Sewage Line Compensation Dispute
Cited regarding the origin of the right of way servitude (through construction if externally recognizable).
A-3425/2016 (Art. 676 Abs. 3 ZGB)
Landowners' Challenge to Power Line Easement Renewal Dismissed
Suggests that servitudes arise at the time a visible line is constructed.
BRGE.III.Nr.0246.20 · zh (Art. 676 ZGB)
Municipal Works Permit Revocation and Right-of-Way Condition
Discussed in detail to assess whether the existence of a right-of-way exists without a land registry entry, relevant to the substance of the required proof.
7H 15 178 · lu (Art. 676 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Landowner Sewage Fee Waiver Invalid Due to Lack of Equivalent Consideration
Cited in the reasoning regarding the basis for establishing a right of passage easement via expropriation, but not explicitly used in the final orders.
VB.2016.00116 · zh (Art. 676 Abs. 1 ZGB)
Property Owners v. Municipality: Water Pipe Classification and Cost Allocation
This specific paragraph concerning ownership and maintenance obligations was implicitly used in the context of qualifying the pipe as a house connection.
VB.2016.00116 · zh (Art. 676 ZGB)
Property Owners v. Municipality: Water Pipe Classification and Cost Allocation
The court's ruling is based on the interpretation and application of property law concerning water pipes, which falls under Art. 676 ZGB regarding the ownership of conduits.