210 ZGBCC

CH

Art. 378 Codice civile svizzero (CC)

CC; Parte terza: Della protezione degli adulti; Titolo decimo: Delle misure precauzionali personali e delle misure applicabili per legge; Capo secondo: Delle misure applicabili per legge alle persone incapaci di discernimento; B. Persone con diritto di rappresentanza

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (1,277 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 378 CC

Le seguenti persone hanno diritto, nell’ordine, di rappresentare la persona incapace di discernimento e di dare o rifiutare il consenso per i provvedimenti ambulatoriali o stazionari previsti: 1. la persona designata nelle direttive del paziente o nel mandato precauzionale; 2. il curatore con diritto di rappresentanza in caso di provvedimenti medici; 3. il coniuge o partner registrato che vive in comunione domestica con la persona incapace di discernimento o le presta di persona regolare assistenza; 4. la persona che vive in comunione domestica con la persona incapace di discernimento e le presta di persona regolare assistenza; 5. i discendenti, se prestano di persona regolare assistenza alla persona incapace di discernimento; 6. i genitori, se prestano di persona regolare assistenza alla persona incapace di discernimento; 7. i fratelli e le sorelle, se prestano di persona regolare assistenza alla persona incapace di discernimento.

Se più persone hanno diritto di rappresentanza, il medico di buona fede può presumere che ciascuna agisca di comune accordo con le altre.

Se mancano istruzioni nelle direttive del paziente, la persona con diritto di rappresentanza decide secondo la volontà presumibile e conformemente agli interessi della persona incapace di discernimento.

← Art. 377 CC Codice civile svizzero (CC) Art. 379 CC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (33)

106 2024 64 · fr (Art. 378 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 ZGB)

Appeal Regarding Placement of Incapacitated Person in Dementia Unit and Cost Allocation

The court confirmed the rejection of the appeal based on the representative authority of the professional guardian concerning medical matters, implicitly confirming the lower court's decision based on this provision.

C/20746/2018 · ge (art. 378 al. 1 ch. 2 CC)

Appellant v. Lower Court Decision on Curatorship Extension

Cited in the reasoning regarding who is authorized to represent a person regarding medical care.

170----------- · vd (Art. 378 al. 1 CC)

Daughters' Appeal of Appointed Medical Curator Overturned

Cited in the introduction as part of the context of the initial decision, but the final order concerns the rejection of the appeal which challenged its application regarding the curatorship designation.

Arr.t.2022.566 · vd (Art. 378 al. 1 CC)

Guardianship Expansion Appeal Regarding Health Matters and Due Process Rights

Cited in the introductory header, though the operative part refers to the continuation of the mandate concerning the persons listed here (descendants).

CMPEA.2021.55 · ne (Art. 378 CC)

Daughters' Qualification as Therapeutic Representatives After Father's Stroke

The court confirmed that A.____ and B.____ can act as therapeutic representatives based on this provision.

VD.2020.69 · bs (Art. 378 ZGB)

KESB Refusal to Validate Power of Attorney Upheld Over Alzheimer's Patient's Objection

Cited in the original decision (Ziff. 5b) to determine who represents the protected person regarding medical measures if no instruction exists.

Arr.t.2019.1152 · vd (Art. 378 al. 1 CC)

Curatorship Appeal Regarding Health Decision Authority and Care Setting Dispute

Although cited in the reasoning section regarding the hierarchy of representatives, it is not explicitly cited in the operative part (dispositive I-IV).

PQ190053 · zh (Art. 378 Abs. 1 ZGB)

Incapacitated Adult Medical Representation Dispute: Mother Preferred Over Estranged Wife

The court determined that the appellant (Beschwerdeführerin) is legally authorized to represent the patient in medical matters based on this provision (Art. 378 Abs. 1 Ziff. 6 ZGB).

P/18187/2016 · ge (art. 378 al. 1 CC)

Guardian's Authority to File Criminal Complaint for Incapacitated Ward

Cited by the TPAE to extend protection measures based on the parties being under their son's control, which was part of the factual basis supporting the curator's authority to file the complaint.

106 2018 90 · fr (art. 378 al. 1 ch. 2 CC)

Cantonal Court Annuls Curatorship Due to Improved Condition and Existing Support

This provision concerns representation in the medical field, which was part of the scope of the curatelle ordered by the lower court.

A/2220/2016 · ge (art. 378 al. 1 du Code civil suisse du 10 décembre 1907 (CC - RS 210))

Son's Appeal for Father's Medical Records Denied on Grounds of Patient Confidentiality

Used in the reasoning to establish the appellant's standing to appeal against the Commission's decision regarding the lifting of professional secrecy.

VD.2016.127 · bs (Art. 378 ZGB)

Appeal Concerning Professional Guardian's Authority Over Medical Decisions

This article was cited in the operative part (Ziff. 5 lit. b of the original decision, which was upheld) as the legal basis for determining the representative persons in case of inability to consent to medical measures when no advance directive exists.

Arr.t.2016.927 · vd (Art. 378 CC)

Guardian Authority to Sign Residency Contract for Incapacitated Person

Cited in the reasoning to establish the representative's duties, which justifies the curator's initial action requiring authorization.

ZK1 2016 86 · gr (Art. 378 Abs. 1 Ziff. 2 ZGB)

Cantonal Court Upholds Representative Guardianship for Individual with PTSD

Cited in the second order (item c) to explicitly exclude the power of representation for medical measures in cases of incapacity.

Arr.t.2016.47 · vd (Art. 378 al. 1 ch. 4 CC)

Curatorship Appeal Regarding Cognitive Impairment and Scope of Civil Rights Restriction

This provision was cited regarding the request concerning who decides on medical care, which requires a new decision by the lower court.