Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
210 ZGBCC CH

Art. 29 Codice civile svizzero (CC)

CC; Titolo primo: Delle persone fisiche; Capo primo: Del diritto della personalità; B. Protezione della personalità; III. Diritto a nome; 1. Protezione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (1,277 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 29 CC

Se a qualcuno è contestato l’uso del proprio nome, egli può chiederne in giudizio il riconoscimento.

Ove alcuno subisca pregiudizio per il fatto che altri usurpi il proprio nome, può chiedere in giudizio la cessazione dell’usurpazione stessa. In caso di colpa può chiedere il risarcimento del danno, e quando la natura dell’offesa lo giustifichi, il pagamento di una somma a titolo di riparazione morale.

← Art. 28l CC Codice civile svizzero (CC) Art. 30 CC →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (27)

C/6990/2023 · ge (Art. 29 al. 2 CC)
Surname Use in Restaurant Name Dispute
This article, concerning the action to cease name usurpation, was cited as the substantive basis for the initial claim, the failure of which justified confirming the dismissal of the provisional measures sought by the appellant.
HG190039 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
A.____ vs. B.____ Trademark Infringement and Validity
Cited in the reasoning, leading to the dismissal of claims based on name law in the dispositive.
HG190212 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
A._____ Companies v. B._____ GmbH Name and Domain Infringement
Basis for prohibiting the defendant from using the signs specified as company identifiers or in business dealings.
ZKBER.2019.55 · so (Art. 29 ZGB)
Appeal Dismissed Regarding Provisional Measures in Divorce: Custody and Marital Home Eviction Upheld
Cited in the reasoning when the appellant invoked their right to personality (Persönlichkeitsrecht).
ZK.2016.5 · bs (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Landlord v. Former Tenants: Trademark Infringement and Void Trademark Based on Invalid Lease Clause
The substantive right (protection against appropriation of a name) underpinning the application of Art. 2 lit. d MSchG in the counterclaim for invalidity.
C/20925/2017 · ge (art. 29 al. 2 CC)
Association v. Political Party: Acronym Confusion Injunction
Underlying legal basis for the prohibition granted regarding the right to a name, as confirmed by the facts established in the reasoning.
16.2017.PHC · vd (art. 29 al. 2 CC)
Investment Firm v. Swiss Company (Trade Name Confusion)
Cited by the applicant as a basis for protection against the use of their name (usurpation).
HG130037 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Financial Institution v. Domain Name Registrant
Used as the legal basis for the court's decision on name protection and the prohibition of using the C._____ sign.
HE130235 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Verein A1. v. Swiss Hostels Preliminary Injunction Denial
Cited in the requests as a basis for the demand for removal and destruction of materials related to the name (Request 1).
HG110102 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Insurance Group v. Brokerage: Trademark and Name Infringement via Domain Name
Underlies the granted injunctions (Orders 1 and 2) and the order for transfer (Order 3) based on the violation of the claimant's name right.
11.2008.135 · ti (art. 29 cpv. 2 CC)
Surname Dispute Following Foreign Name Change
The appeal was decided based on this article, which governs actions to cease the usurpation of one's name.
HG090317 · zh (Art. 29 Abs. 2 ZGB)
Keytrade AG v. Keytrade Bank SA (Swiss Branch Name Infringement)
Cited in the reasoning leading to order 2, as the basis for the claim to prohibit the defendant from using certain designations for its services (alternative to trademark law).
AP.2010.22 · vd (Art. 29 CC)
Bankruptcy Estate v. Individual: Domain Name Ownership Dispute
The substantive provision used to qualify the domain name as a commercial name, although this is mentioned in the reasoning and not explicitly in the dispositive, the provision is listed at the start of the decision, often indicating the main legal framework for the substance of the dispute which the court upheld by rejecting the claim in I.
C/1900/2008 · ge (art. 28 et 29 CC)
Ocean Beauty v. OCEANE INSTITUT GENEVE SARL
Cited in the reasoning section as the basis for the claimant's claims regarding trade name protection, but not explicitly cited in the operative part.
C/1900/2008 · ge (art. 29 al. 2 CC)
Ocean Beauty v. OCEANE INSTITUT GENEVE SARL
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the action to cease interference with a trade name, but not explicitly cited in the operative part.