210
ZGBCC
CH
Art. 168 Codice civile svizzero (CC)
CC; Parte prima: Del diritto matrimoniale; Titolo quinto : Degli effetti del matrimonio in generale; H. Negozi giuridici dei coniugi; I. In genere
Art. 168 CC
Salvo diverso disposto della legge, ciascun coniuge può liberamente concludere negozi giuridici con l’altro o con terzi.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (7)
ZKBER.2017.47 · so (Art. 168 ZGB)
Spousal Support Appeal Regarding Provisional Amount and Retroactivity
Referenced to support the principle of respecting the contractual freedom of the spouses concerning support payments made prior to the divorce petition.
HC.2016.345 · vd (Art. 168 CC)
Divorce Property Division and Loan Reimbursement Dispute Over Marital Villa
Cited in the discussion about a spouse's right to make a gift to the other spouse.
C/6047/2009 · ge (art. 168 CC)
Divorce: Spousal Support and Fiduciary Duty Regarding Investment Funds
Cited to confirm that contractual freedom is not restricted by marriage concerning mandate agreements.
OG ARGVP 2010 2288 · ar (Art. 168 Abs. 2 EG zum ZGB)
Road Maintenance Association Rights vs. Dissenting Property Owner Expropriation
This provision is mentioned to establish that the appellant, despite being subject to compulsory accession to the association, does not automatically grant property rights.
Verwaltung ARGVP 2006 1435 · ar (Art. 168 Abs. 2 EG zum ZGB)
Storage Yard Expansion Legality and Unlawful Prior Use
This provision, adopted from federal law, supported the obligation for landowners to join the Flurgenossenschaft.
Verwaltung ARGVP 2006 1436 · ar (Art. 168 Abs. 2 EG zum ZGB)
Unlawful Construction, Compulsory Land Inclusion, and Cultural Property Preservation Ruling
Cited as the cantonal law provision incorporating the condition for mandatory participation in land improvement projects.
11.2014.94 · ti (art. 168 CC)
Appellate Decision on Loan Reimbursement, Tax Obligation, Professional Collaboration Compensation, and Pension Split in Divorce Under Separation of Property Regime
Cited in the reasoning regarding contractual freedom in arranging financial contribution to the family, but not in the dispositive.