173.71 STBOGLOAP

CH

Art. 65 Legge federale del 19 marzo 2010 sull'organizzazione delle autorità penali della Confederazione (LOAP)

LOAP; Titolo terzo: Autorità giudiziarie; Capitolo 2: Giudici cantonali dei provvedimenti coercitivi

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (83 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 65 LOAP

I giudici cantonali dei provvedimenti coercitivi del luogo in cui ha sede principale o distaccata il Ministero pubblico della Confederazione si pronunciano, nei casi che sottostanno alla giurisdizione federale, su tutti i provvedimenti coercitivi di cui all’articolo 18 capoverso 1 CPP .

È competente il giudice cantonale dei provvedimenti coercitivi del luogo in cui si svolge il procedimento.

Le decisioni di cui al capoverso 1 sono impugnabili con reclamo dinanzi al Tribunale penale federale.

Se un giudice cantonale dei provvedimenti coercitivi decide in un caso che sottostà alla giurisdizione federale, la Confederazione indennizza il Cantone. L’indennizzo è definito caso per caso; è stabilito aumentando di un quarto l’importo delle spese procedurali che il giudice dei provvedimenti coercitivi fisserebbe in un caso analogo sottostante alla giurisdizione cantonale.

← Art. 64 LOAP Legge federale del 19 marzo 2010 sull'organizzazione delle autorità penali della Confederazione (LOAP) - Oggetto e campo d’applicazione Art. 66 LOAP →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (23)

BH.2025.3 (Art. 65 Abs. 1 und 3 StBOG)

Pre-trial detention upheld due to risk of collusion in international drug trafficking case.

Cited as the basis for the jurisdiction of the Federal Criminal Court's appellate chamber in cases involving federal prosecution.

BH.2025.1 (art. 65 al. 1 et 3 LOAP)

Seizure of Documents and Travel Ban Upheld in Terrorism and Drug Trafficking Case

Establishes the competence of the court of complaint for appeals against decisions of cantonal courts regarding substitute measures.

BH.2024.8 (Art. 65 Abs. 1 und 3 i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Terrorism Support Propaganda and Finance Case

These provisions establish the Federal Criminal Court's jurisdiction to hear appeals against decisions of cantonal detention courts in matters of federal jurisdiction.

BH.2023.13 (Art. 65 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Pre-Trial Detention Upheld for Suspected ISIS Supporter

Cited to establish the jurisdiction of the Federal Criminal Court's appellate chamber for appeals against decisions of cantonal courts concerning coercive measures within federal jurisdiction.

BH.2023.12 (art. 65 al. 1 et 3 LOAP)

Prolonged Detention Upheld Amidst Serious Suspicions of Grave Offenses

Further defines the jurisdiction and organization of the Federal Criminal Court of Appeals.

BH.2022.13 (Art. 65 Abs. 1 und 3 i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Crimes Against Humanity Suspect Detained Amidst New Evidence and Flight Risk

Cited as the basis for the jurisdiction of the Federal Criminal Court's appellate chamber in reviewing decisions from cantonal coercion measures courts.

BH.2022.4 (Art. 65 Abs. 1 und 3 i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Detention Extension Upheld for Explosives Suspect

Cited as the basis for the jurisdiction of the appellate chamber in cases involving federal law.

BH.2021.8 (Art. 65 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Appellant's Detention and Conditions of Detention for Terrorism and Incitement Charges

The court confirmed its jurisdiction to hear appeals against decisions of cantonal detention courts in matters under federal jurisdiction.

BH.2021.2 (Art. 65 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Pretrial Detention Extended for Suspect in Crimes Against Humanity

Cited regarding the jurisdiction of the Federal Criminal Court's appellate chamber for appeals against decisions of cantonal courts regarding coercive measures in federal matters.

BH.2021.1 (Art. 65 Abs. 1 und 3 i.V.m. Art. 37 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Austrian Court Upholds Detention of Suspect in Terror Plot

These provisions establish the jurisdiction of the Federal Criminal Court's appellate chamber for appeals against decisions of cantonal courts in matters falling under federal jurisdiction.

RH.2019.20 (art. 65 al. 2 LOAP)

Extradition Arrest Warrant Upheld Despite Appeal

Cited for the court's authority to assign legal counsel to the appellant if their rights require it, applicable by reference from EIMP.

BH.2019.3 (Art. 37 Abs. 1, Art. 65 Abs. 1 und Abs. 3 StBOG)

Pre-trial Detention Extended for Crimes Against Humanity Suspect

Cited as the basis for the appellate chamber's jurisdiction over appeals against decisions of cantonal detention measures courts.

BH.2019.3 (Art. 65 Abs. 4 StBOG)

Pre-trial Detention Extended for Crimes Against Humanity Suspect

Referred to regarding the cost distribution decision within the contested order, stating it does not directly affect the appellant.

BH.2018.4 (Art. 65 Abs. 1 StBOG)

Termination of Substitute Measures Due to Insufficient Evidence and Investigation Delays

This article is cited as part of the jurisdictional basis for the federal criminal court's review of decisions on coercive measures.

BH.2018.4 (Art. 65 Abs. 3 StBOG)

Termination of Substitute Measures Due to Insufficient Evidence and Investigation Delays

This article is cited as part of the jurisdictional basis for the federal criminal court's review of decisions on coercive measures.