Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.71 STBOGLOAP CH

Art. 63 Legge federale del 19 marzo 2010 sull'organizzazione delle autorità penali della Confederazione (LOAP) - Informazione

LOAP; Titolo terzo: Autorità giudiziarie; Capitolo 1: Tribunale penale federale
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (83 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 63 LOAP · Informazione

Il Tribunale penale federale informa il pubblico sulla propria giurisprudenza.

La pubblicazione delle sentenze avviene di norma in forma anonimizzata.

Il Tribunale penale federale disciplina in un regolamento i principi dell’informazione.

Per la cronaca giudiziaria il Tribunale penale federale può prevedere un accreditamento.

← Art. 62a LOAP Legge federale del 19 marzo 2010 sull'organizzazione delle autorità penali della Confederazione (LOAP) - Oggetto e campo d’applicazione Art. 64 LOAP →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (14)

BP.2025.35 (art. 63 al. 2 LOAP)
Enhanced Anonymization Request Rejected in Pre-Trial Detention Case
Cited as the basis for the court's obligation to publish its decisions, in principle, in anonymized form to protect the interests of the parties.
BB.2024.110 (art. 63 al. 2 LOAP)
Recusal Denied: Procedural Rulings and Language Insufficient to Prove Judicial Bias
This provision is cited as the basis for anonymizing the applicant's name in the decision.
BB.2024.126 (Art. 63 al. 2 LOAP)
Companies' Recusal Motions in Money Laundering Investigation Denied
Cited to justify the anonymization of the applicants' names in the publication of the decision.
BB.2024.66 (art. 63 LOAP)
Espionage Suspect's Appeal Against Surveillance Rejected
Cited regarding the Federal Criminal Court's duty to inform the public about its case law and the anonymization of judgments.
RR.2021.108 (Art. 63 Abs. 3 StBOG)
Witness Refuses Testimony, Appeal Dismissed
Used in conjunction with other provisions to determine the competence of the General Secretariat to decide on the deferral of the publication of the decision.
BV.2019.48 (Art. 63 Abs. 3 StBOG)
Appellant challenges BFE fine for unauthorized network data use, disclosure, and disciplinary proceedings.
This provision is cited in conjunction with Art. 10 Abs. 2 lit. d Organisationsreglement BstGerOR and Art. 2 Abs. 2 Informationsreglement BstGer to forward the request for non-publication.
BB.2018.130 (Art. 63 Abs. 3 StBOG)
Criminal Defendant's Appeal of Evidentiary and Transcript Rulings Denied
Relates to the forwarding of the request for postponement of publication to the relevant authority.
BB.2019.34 (Art. 63 Abs. 3 StBOG)
Official Misconduct and Document Forgery Case Appeal Dismissed
Relevant for requests concerning the publication of decisions.
BB.2019.49 (Art. 63 StBOG)
Mootness of Appeal for Disputed Discovery Documents
Cited in conjunction with other provisions for setting the court fee.
RR.2013.91 (art. 63 cpv. 1 LOAP)
International Judicial Assistance for Money Laundering Investigation
Cited to determine that costs follow the outcome of the appeal.
RR.2012.313 (Art. 63 cpv. 1 LOAP)
International Judicial Assistance for Italy: Account Freezing Upheld
Applied to order that costs follow the outcome of the case.
RR.2011.120 (Art. 63 Abs. 1 i.V.m. Art. 39 Abs. 2 lit. b StBOG)
Germany v. Switzerland: Insufficient Factual Basis for Tax Evasion Assistance
Used to waive court fees for the appellants due to the outcome of the proceedings.
RH.2012.4 (Art. 63 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Extradition Arrest Warrant Upheld Amid Due Process Claims
Cited as the basis for applying the principle that costs follow the event in administrative proceedings.
TPF 2023 55 (Art. 63 al. 1 LOAP)
National Prosecuting Authority v. Federal Office of Justice (Switzerland Extradition)
Cited as the basis for the Federal Criminal Court informing the public of its jurisprudence.