173.71
STBOGLOAP
CH
CH
Art. 40 Legge federale del 19 marzo 2010 sull'organizzazione delle autorità penali della Confederazione (LOAP) - Revisione, interpretazione e rettifica di decisioni delle corti dei reclami penali
LOAP; Titolo terzo: Autorità giudiziarie; Capitolo 1: Tribunale penale federale
Art. 40 LOAP · Revisione, interpretazione e rettifica di decisioni delle corti dei reclami penali
Gli articoli 121–129 della legge del 17 giugno 2005 sul Tribunale federale si applicano per analogia alla revisione, all’interpretazione e alla rettifica delle decisioni delle corti dei reclami penali di cui all’articolo 37 capoverso 2.
I motivi che l’istante avrebbe potuto invocare in un ricorso contro la decisione della Corte dei reclami penali non sono proponibili come motivi di revisione.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (47)
CR.2023.1 (art. 40 al. 1 LOAP)
Mootness and Inadmissibility of Extradition Review
Applied for the revision procedure before the Federal Criminal Court, indicating that Articles 121 to 129 LTF apply by analogy.
CR.2023.1 (art. 40 al. 2 LOAP)
Mootness and Inadmissibility of Extradition Review
Applied to exclude grounds for revision that were or could have been raised in ordinary proceedings.
CR.2025.5 (Art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Dismissal of Extradition Revision Request
Cited for the application of LTF articles to the revision of decisions of the criminal appeals court.
CR.2023.5 (art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Review of Procedural Decision on Inadmissible Appeal Denied
Establishes the application of articles 121-129 LTF to revision requests concerning decisions of the criminal appeals court.
CR.2023.3 (Art. 40 cpv. 2 LOAP)
Company's Review Request Inadmissible for Late Appeal Grounds
Cited as the legal basis for declaring the revision request inadmissible because the grounds for revision were not permissible as they could have been raised in an appeal.
CR.2021.22 (art. 40 al. 1 LOAP)
Revision Denied: Company Fails to Prove Signatory Authority
Establishes the applicability of Articles 121 to 129 LTF to revision requests for decisions made by the Court of Complaints.
CR.2021.10 (art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Applicant Lacks Standing to Challenge International Judicial Assistance in Money Laundering Probe
Cited to establish the applicability of LTF articles to the revision procedure.
CR.2021.11 (Art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Revision of Decision on International Judicial Assistance Denied
Governs the application of LTF articles to the revision of decisions by the criminal appeals courts.
CR.2021.12 (art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Revision of International Legal Assistance Decision Denied
Indicates the applicability of articles 121-129 LTF to the review of decisions of the criminal appeals court.
CR.2021.13 (Art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Revision denied: Vatican legal assistance case lacks standing and timely evidence.
Cited for the analogous application of articles 121-129 LTF to reviews of decisions by the criminal appeals court.
CR.2021.14 (art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Applicant Lacks Standing to Challenge Vatican's Rule of Law in Judicial Assistance Case
Used to establish the appellate court's jurisdiction over the revision request by applying the Federal Supreme Court Act by analogy.
CR.2021.15 (art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Applicant Lacks Standing to Challenge Foreign Judicial Assistance Request on Rule of Law Grounds
Used to establish the applicability of articles 121-129 LTF to the revision of decisions made by the criminal appeals courts.
CR.2021.16 (art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Revision Request for International Judicial Assistance Denied on Standing and Admissibility Grounds
Cited as the basis for applying the LTF provisions analogously to the review of decisions by the criminal appeals court.
CR.2021.17 (art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Revision of International Legal Assistance Decision Denied for Lack of Standing and Untimely Evidence
Cited as the basis for applying articles 121-129 LTF to revision requests of decisions from the criminal appellate courts.
CR.2021.18 (art. 40 cpv. 1 LOAP)
Vatican Banking Document Disclosure Upheld
Procedural basis for applying LTF articles to revision of decisions by the criminal appeals court.