Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.32 VGGLTAF CH

Art. 6 Legge del 17 giugno 2005 sul Tribunale amministrativo federale (LTAF) - Incompatibilità

LTAF; Capitolo 1: Statuto e organizzazione
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (58 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 6 LTAF · Incompatibilità

I giudici non possono essere membri dell’Assemblea federale, del Consiglio federale o del Tribunale federale, né esercitare alcun’altra funzione al servizio della Confederazione.

Non possono esercitare alcuna attività che pregiudichi l’adempimento della loro funzione, l’indipendenza del Tribunale o la sua dignità, né esercitare professionalmente la rappresentanza in giudizio.

I giudici non possono esercitare alcuna funzione ufficiale per uno Stato estero. né accettare titoli o decorazioni conferiti da autorità estere.

I giudici a tempo pieno non possono esercitare alcuna funzione al servizio di un Cantone né altre attività lucrative. Non possono neppure essere membri della direzione, dell’amministrazione, dell’ufficio di vigilanza o dell’ufficio di revisione di un’impresa commerciale.

← Art. 5 LTAF Legge del 17 giugno 2005 sul Tribunale amministrativo federale (LTAF) - Principio Art. 7 LTAF →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (35)

VPB 2007.1762 (Art. 6, al. 1, LTAF)
Federal Patent Court Establishment Act
Clarifies that holding office in the Federal Administrative Court does not preclude also being a substitute judge at the Federal Patent Court.
B-1307/2026 (Art. 6 Abs. 1 und 4 VGG)
Recusal Requests Against Judicial Officers and Court Clerk Denied
Cited by the applicant to argue for the recusal of a judge due to holding a concurrent position, and addressed in the decision.
D-4355/2021 (Art. 6 VGG)
Applicant v. State: Asylum Denial Upheld Due to Lack of Credibility
This provision relates to the court's jurisdiction and was used to establish its competence to hear the case.
D-2975/2021 (Art. 6 VGG)
Asylum seeker's Sri Lanka deportation upheld despite new evidence.
Bestimmt das auf das Verfahren anwendbare Recht.
E-7312/2024 (Art. 6 VGG)
Asylum Seeker's Removal to Malta Upheld Despite Domestic Violence and Tuberculosis Claims
Cited as the basis for the Federal Administrative Court's jurisdiction in appeals against SEM decisions.
E-1510/2024 (Art. 6 LTAF)
Asylum claim rejected: skills, not protected grounds, led to brotherhood's interest.
Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the request for legal aid.
D-5722/2022 (Art. 6 Abs. 1 VGG)
Asylum Applicant's Fear of Persecution Leads to Remand of Deportation Decision
This provision is not explicitly cited in the dispositive. However, the court states that procedure is governed by VGG, in so far as AsylG does not provide otherwise.
E-4961/2019 (Art. 6 VGG)
Asylum Appeal Dismissed: Syrian Refugee Claim Denied
Specifies that the Asylum Act applies unless otherwise provided by the Administrative Procedure Act.
VD.2021.244 · bs (§ 6 VGG)
Appeal Against Revocation of Settlement Permit Due to Debt Accumulation
Applied regarding the decision on court fees for the administrative court appeal procedure.
E-3122/2019 (Art. 6 Abs. 1 VGG)
Sudanese asylum seeker's claims lacking credibility, expulsion order remanded for reassessment of country conditions.
This article is not explicitly cited in the dispositive section. It is mentioned in the reasoning regarding the governing law but not in the final orders.
VD.2021.95 · bs (§ 6 VGG)
Immigration Permit Revocation Overruled Due to Family Rights
Applied in conjunction with § 7 Abs. 1 VGG and § 30 Abs. 1 VRPG to determine that no court costs shall be levied for the administrative court appeal proceedings.
VD.2020.194 · bs (§ 6 VGG)
Home Care Permit Revocation Appeal
Cited in the final order regarding the imposition of party compensation for the administrative appeal procedure.
VD.2017.208 · bs (§ 6 [...] VGG)
Residence Permit Revocation Appeal: Public Interest vs. Family Life
Applied to waive court costs for the internal administrative appeal procedure.
VD.2020.150 · bs (§ 6 VGG)
Land Transfer Registration Following Corporate Merger and Tax Exemption Requirement
Cited as the basis for not levying court costs for the administrative appeal procedure because the appeal was granted.
VD.2020.75 · bs (§ 6 VGG)
Appeal Against Rejection of Residency Permit Extension Due to Marital Dissolution and Health Circumstances
Cited in the dispositive order regarding the non-imposition of procedural costs for the administrative appeal procedures.