173.32
VGGLTAF
CH
CH
Art. 40 Legge del 17 giugno 2005 sul Tribunale amministrativo federale (LTAF) - Dibattimento
LTAF; Capitolo 3: Procedura
Art. 40 LTAF · Dibattimento
Laddove si debbano giudicare diritti di carattere civile o accuse penali a tenore dell’articolo 6 paragrafo 1 della Convenzione del 4 novembre 1950 per la salvaguardia dei diritti dell’uomo e delle libertà fondamentali, il giudice dell’istruzione ordina un dibattimento pubblico: a. ad istanza di parte; o b. qualora importanti interessi pubblici lo giustifichino.
Il presidente della corte o il giudice unico può ordinare un dibattimento pubblico anche in altri casi.
Qualora vi sia da temere un pericolo per la sicurezza, l’ordine pubblico o i buoni costumi o qualora l’interesse di una persona in causa lo giustifichi, il dibattimento può svolgersi in tutto o in parte a porte chiuse.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (24)
A-2082/2024 (Art. 40 Abs. 1 VGG)
Challenge to Household Broadcasting Fee Collection Dismissed
Used to deny the request for a public hearing because the case did not fall under the scope of Article 6(1) ECHR.
D-4432/2020 (Art. 40 Abs. 1 VGG)
Sri Lankan National's Asylum Appeal Denied Due to Lack of Credibility and Irrelevant Past Activities
Procedural rule regarding oral hearings.
D-4432/2020 (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VGG)
Sri Lankan National's Asylum Appeal Denied Due to Lack of Credibility and Irrelevant Past Activities
Procedural rule regarding oral hearings.
A-3183/2022 (Art. 40 Abs. 1 VGG)
Tax Treaty: Swiss Assistance in German Tax Investigation Upheld
Used to analyze the request for a public hearing.
A-3183/2022 (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VGG)
Tax Treaty: Swiss Assistance in German Tax Investigation Upheld
Used to dismiss the request for a public hearing as there is no reason to hold one.
A-3183/2022 (Art. 40 Abs. 3 VGG)
Tax Treaty: Swiss Assistance in German Tax Investigation Upheld
Used to state that secrecy interests of the affected person do not need to be considered after rejecting the request for a public hearing.
D-7241/2017 (Art. 40 Abs. 1 VGG)
Federal Administrative Court upholds asylum rejection and removal order due to inconsistent and lack of credible evidence.
Cited regarding the lack of a right to a public oral hearing in asylum appeal proceedings.
D-7241/2017 (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VGG)
Federal Administrative Court upholds asylum rejection and removal order due to inconsistent and lack of credible evidence.
Cited regarding the possibility of an oral hearing if the facts are not sufficiently established, which was rejected in this case.
D-4620/2021 (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VGG)
Sri Lanka: Activist Asylum Appeal Rejected, Deportation Upheld
The court dismisses the request for an oral hearing based on the lack of such a right.
C-6740/2018 (art. 40 al. 1 LTAF)
Disability Pension Suspension Unlawful Without Prior Hearing
Cited in relation to the right to a public hearing as guaranteed by the ECHR.
B-7258/2017 (Art. 40 Abs. 1 VGG)
Candidate v. Real Estate Trust Board of Examiners
Cited to deny the request for an oral hearing.
B-6363/2014 (Art. 40 des Verwaltungsgerichtsgesetzes vom 17. Juni 2005 [VGG, SR 173.32])
Meissen Trademark Protection Partially Granted in Switzerland for Porcelain and Related Goods
Cited in the procedural section regarding the decision to conduct proceedings in writing.
BVGE-2014-52 (Art. 40 al. 1 LTAF)
Absinthe Designations Ruled Generic, Not Protected Geographical Indications
The court used this provision to state that public hearings could be waived when the substantive conclusions could be admitted based on the file alone.
B-433/2013 (Art. 40 Abs. 1 VGG)
METROPOOL Trademark Opposition
This provision states that a party hearing is not conducted in this specific instance.
C-6178/2010 (Art. 40 Abs. 1 lit. a VGG)
University Research Center Grant Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Standing
Cited to state that an oral hearing is only mandatory if a party requests it in the context of civil claims or criminal charges.