173.32
VGGLTAF
CH
CH
Art. 35 Legge del 17 giugno 2005 sul Tribunale amministrativo federale (LTAF) - Principio
LTAF; Capitolo 2: Competenze
Art. 35 LTAF · Principio
Il Tribunale amministrativo federale giudica su azione in prima istanza: a. le controversie derivanti da contratti di diritto pubblico sottoscritti dalla Confederazione, dai suoi stabilimenti, dalle sue aziende o dalle organizzazioni ai sensi dell’articolo 33 lettera h; b. ... c. le controversie tra la Confederazione e la Banca nazionale concernenti le convenzioni sui servizi bancari e sulla distribuzione dell’utile; d. le domande di confisca di valori patrimoniali conformemente alla legge del 18 dicembre 2015 sui valori patrimoniali di provenienza illecita.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (22)
A-3793/2022 (Art. 35 VGG)
Federal Government Owns Pedestrian Bridge as Part of National Road
Determines when a direct lawsuit, rather than an appeal, is the appropriate legal remedy.
B-995/2023 (Art. 35 Bst. a VGG)
Livestock Conservation Grant Dispute: Contractual vs. Administrative Procedure
Cited to explain that claims from public-law contracts are generally to be pursued through a direct action, which is relevant to the procedural framework of the case.
B-2893/2022 (Art. 35 Bst. a VGG)
Canton v. Federal Government: Contractual Dispute Over COVID-19 Aid Reimbursement
Cited regarding the jurisdiction of the Federal Administrative Court for disputes arising from federal public-law contracts.
B-2722/2019 (Art. 35 Bst. a VGG)
Export Credit Insurance Claim Dismissed Due to Insufficient Proof of Debt
Establishes the jurisdiction of the Federal Administrative Court for disputes arising from public law contracts involving the Confederation.
C-1293/2021 (Art. 35 lett. a LTAF)
Swiss OASI Pension Calculation Discrimination Case
The appeal was considered inadmissible as an action under this provision because the matter did not concern a public law contract concluded by the Confederation.
B-4545/2010 (Art. 35 let. a LTAF)
Training Company v. Canton and Confederation: Contract Dispute Over Subsidies
Legal provision used to establish the court's jurisdiction over public law contracts.
B-8031/2015 (Art. 35 Bst. a VGG)
Regional Authority v. Employment Association (Recycling Revenue Dispute)
This article defines the jurisdiction of the Federal Administrative Court for disputes arising from public-law contracts involving federal entities or organizations acting on behalf of federal entities.
A-4232/2015 (Art. 29 Abs. 4 DSG i.V.m. Art. 35 Bst. b VGG)
Unlawful Processing of Personality Profiles and Creditworthiness Data
Used to establish the EDÖB's competence to bring the matter before the Federal Administrative Court if its recommendation is not followed.
A-5225/2015 (Art. 35 Bst. b VGG)
Data Processing Company Fined for Data Protection Violations
Basis for the Federal Administrative Court's jurisdiction over disputes concerning recommendations from the FDPÖ.
A-4873/2014 (Art. 35 Bst. a VGG)
Servitude Agreement Valid, Compensation for All Anchors Awarded
Cited regarding the jurisdiction of the Federal Administrative Court for disputes arising from public law contracts.
BVGE-2015-15 (Art. 35 Bst. a VGG)
Guarantor's Obligations: Civil Lawsuit Required, Not Administrative Order
Cited as the legal basis for the court's jurisdiction over disputes arising from public law contracts, establishing the requirement of an administrative law action (Klage) rather than a decision (Verfügung) in such cases.
B-2415/2012 (art. 35 let. a LTAF)
Subsidized Housing Owner Denied Automatic Rent Increases Due to Repaid Debt
Cited as the basis for the federal administrative court's jurisdiction over disputes based on public law contracts concluded by the Confederation.
B-408/2009 (Art. 35 let. a LTAF)
Repayment of Unemployment Subsidies Requires Civil Action, Not Administrative Decision
Establishes the Federal Administrative Court's jurisdiction in first instance for disputes arising from public law contracts signed by the Confederation or organizations specified in Art. 33 let. h LTAF.
BVGE-2009-49 (Art. 35 let. a LTAF)
Federal Administrative Court Jurisdiction Over Subsidy Recovery from Labor Market Measures
Used to determine that claims arising from a public law contract must be brought by way of an action before the Federal Administrative Court.
B-7915/2007 (art. 35 let. a LTAF)
Social Insurance Fund v. SECO: Apprenticeship Expenses and Financial Penalties
Used to determine that the Confederation should pursue its claim for a malus through an action rather than a decision.