172.021 VWVGPA

CH

Art. 55 Legge federale del 20 dicembre 1968 sulla procedura amministrativa (PA)

PA; Capo terzo: Della procedura di ricorso in generale; H. Altre regole di procedura fino a decisione del ricorso; II. Provvedimenti d’urgenza; 1. Effetto sospensivo

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (93 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 55 PA

Il ricorso ha effetto sospensivo.

Nella decisione, se non ha per oggetto una prestazione pecuniaria, l’autorità inferiore può togliere l’effetto sospensivo a un eventuale ricorso; l’autorità di ricorso, il suo presidente o il giudice dell’istruzione ha lo stesso diritto dopo il deposito del ricorso.

L’autorità di ricorso, il suo presidente o il giudice dell’istruzione può restituire a un ricorso l’effetto sospensivo toltogli dall’autorità inferiore; la domanda di restituzione dell’effetto sospensivo è trattata senza indugio.

Se l’effetto sospensivo è tolto arbitrariamente o se la domanda di restituzione dell’effetto sospensivo è stata arbitrariamente respinta o ritardata, l’ente o l’istituto autonomo nel cui nome l’autorità ha stabilito risponde del danno che ne deriva.

Sono riservate le disposizioni di altre leggi federali secondo le quali il ricorso non ha effetto sospensivo.

← Art. 54 PA Legge federale del 20 dicembre 1968 sulla procedura amministrativa (PA) Art. 56 PA →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (1,017)

B-5901/2022 (Art. 55 al. 1 PA)

Foundation Board Dysfunction and Supervisory Authority Intervention

Cited to establish that an appeal generally has suspensive effect.

B-5901/2022 (Art. 55 al. 3 PA)

Foundation Board Dysfunction and Supervisory Authority Intervention

Cited for the competence of the judge to restore suspensive effect to an appeal.

VPB 08-3086-8233 (art. 55 PA)

Federal Gaming Commission v. "Bubble" Gaming Machine Manufacturer

Stated that any appeal against the decision will not have suspensive effect.

VPB 34-2008-3080 (art. 55 PA)

Slot Machine Qualified as Skill Game

This provision is cited to state that an appeal against the decision will not have suspensive effect.

VPB 08-2132-6909 (art. 55 PA)

Federal Gaming Commission Classifies Slot Machine 1.8 as Skill-Based

This provision states that an appeal against the decision will not have suspensive effect.

VPB 10-2008-2133 (art. 55 PA)

Federal Gaming House Commission v. Hot Fruit V. 1.7

This provision was cited to state that an appeal against the decision would not have suspensive effect.

VPB 2008.2134 (art. 55 PA)

Federal Gaming House Commission v. Golden Bell Version 130 Slot Machine

Determines that an appeal against the decision does not have suspensive effect.

VPB 5474-2008-1748 (art. 55 PA)

SPUTNIK POKER Skill Game Authorization

This provision states that an appeal against the decision does not have suspensive effect.

C-1390/2008 (Art. 55 Abs. 1 VwVG)

Clinic TARMED Point Value Dispute

Cited to explain that an appeal generally has suspensive effect.

C-1390/2008 (Art. 55 Abs. 2 VwVG)

Clinic TARMED Point Value Dispute

Cited to explain conditions under which suspensive effect can be withdrawn.

VPB 1338-2008-0610 (art. 55 PA)

Federal Gaming Commission v. Golden Bell Slot Machine

This provision determines that an appeal against the decision will not have a suspensive effect.

VPB 1012-2008-0404 (art. 55 PA)

Federal Gaming Commission Qualifies SPUTNIK SEQUENZ Slot Machine as Skill Game

Cited to establish that an appeal against the decision does not have suspensive effect.

VPB 2007.3035 (art. 55 PA)

Federal Gaming Commission Rules EGYPT TARGET Slot Machine as Skill-Based

States that an appeal against the decision does not have suspensive effect.

VPB 64-2007-3034 (art. 55 PA)

Federal Gaming House Commission Rules HOT FRUIT Slot Machine is Skill-Based

Cited to state that any appeal against the decision will not have suspensive effect.

VPB 150000077 (Art. 55 VwVG)

Broadcaster's Fee Reduction Upheld After Challenge to Calculation Method

This provision is cited in relation to the suspensive effect of appeals, which was a point raised by the appellant.