172.021
VWVGPA
CH
CH
Art. 10 Legge federale del 20 dicembre 1968 sulla procedura amministrativa (PA)
PA; Capo secondo: Regole generali di procedura; B. Ricusazione
Art. 10 PA
Le persone, cui spetti di prendere o preparare la decisione, devono ricusarsi: a. se hanno un interesse personale nella causa; b. se sono il coniuge o il partner registrato di una parte o convivono di fatto con essa; bbis. se sono parenti o affini in linea retta, o in linea collaterale fino al terzo grado, di una parte; c. se sono rappresentanti d’una parte o hanno agito per essa nella medesima causa; d. se possono avere per altri motivi una prevenzione nella causa.
Se la ricusazione è contestata, decide l’autorità di vigilanza; quando concerne un membro d’un collegio, decide quest’ultimo senza il suo concorso.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (177)
C-1405/2019 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 VwVG)
Hospital Denied Specialized Surgery Contract Due to Insufficient Case Volume
This provision, concerning recusal, was discussed in relation to the impartiality of the authorities involved in the HSM process.
JAAC 68.42 (Art. 10 VwVG)
No Bias in Preliminary Legal Aid Refusal
This provision, specifically Art. 10 Abs. 1 Bst. d VwVG, addresses grounds for recusal, including 'other reasons,' which was considered in the context of the judge's prior involvement.
JAAC 65.74 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 Bst. d VwVG)
Asylum Appeals Commission Recusal Denied: Law Limits to Individual Judges, Bias Requires Objective Proof
Cited as the legal basis for the request for recusal.
JAAC 64.43 (Art. 10 VwVG)
Film Production Subsidy Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Development
This provision concerns general principles of impartiality and recusal, which were considered in relation to the composition of the expert committees.
A-8605/2025 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 Bst. d VwVG)
Taxpayer Fails to Prove VAT Payments to Defunct Subcontractors
Cited in the context of discussing the alleged bias of the tax inspector.
RR.2025.93 (art. 10 PA)
Switzerland v. Peru: Bank Documentation for Money Laundering Investigation and Human Rights Assurances
Applied to determine the competence for ruling on the recusal request in the context of international judicial assistance.
A/2887/2024 · ge (Art. 10 al. 1 PA)
Appeal Regarding Cessation of Accident Insurance Benefits Following Ankle Injury and Subsequent Surgery
Cited as the criteria applicable to recusal under Art. 36 al. 1 LPGA.
A/3248/2024 · ge (Art. 10 al. 1 PA)
Appeal of Accident Insurance Benefit Termination Due to Causality Dispute
Cited concerning formal grounds for challenging an expert's impartiality (point 13.2).
B-3253/2024 (Art. 10 al. 1 PA)
Property Manager Exam Appeal Rejected Over Procedural Claims
Lists grounds for recusal of decision-makers.
A/1139/2024 · ge (art. 10 al. 1 PA)
Midwife Accident Insurance Benefits Dispute Over Meniscus Tear Causation
The provision on the grounds for recusal, applied by analogy to expertise in social insurance matters.
B-1565/2024 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 VwVG)
Professional Experience Requirement for Examination Admission Upheld
Relates to the right to impartial decision-makers.
B-1927/2024 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 Bst. d VwVG)
Dismissal of Professional Exam Appeal for Lack of Evidence
Cited regarding the duty of impartiality, including the aspect of prior involvement.
B-1927/2024 (Art. 10 Abs. 1 VwVG)
Dismissal of Professional Exam Appeal for Lack of Evidence
Cited to specify the application of the principle of impartiality to professional examinations.
5V 23 211 5V 24 48 · lu (Art. 10 VwVG)
Unemployment Insurance Benefit Suspension Overturned Due to Insufficient Proof of Fault and Failure to Investigate
Cited in the reasoning regarding the duty to recuse oneself due to bias.
RR.2024.105 (Art. 10 VwVG)
Federal Criminal Court Rejects Extradition Appeal to Italy
Used to reject the request for recusal of the presiding judge.