Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
172.021 VWVGPA CH

Art. 1 Legge federale del 20 dicembre 1968 sulla procedura amministrativa (PA)

PA; Capo primo: Campo d’applicazione e definizioni; A. Campo d’applicazione; I. Principio
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (93 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 1 PA

La presente legge si applica alla procedura negli affari amministrativi trattati e decisi in prima istanza o su ricorso da un’autorità amministrativa federale.

Sono autorità nel senso del capoverso 1: a. il Consiglio federale, i suoi Dipartimenti, la Cancelleria federale, nonché le divisioni, le aziende, gli istituti e gli altri servizi dell’amministrazione federale che da essi dipendono; b. gli organi dell’Assemblea federale e dei tribunali federali per le decisioni di prima istanza e le decisioni su ricorso, in conformità all’ordinamento dei funzionari del 30 giugno 1927 ; c. gli istituti o le aziende federali autonomi; cbis. il Tribunale amministrativo federale; d. le commissioni federali; e. altre istanze od organismi indipendenti dall’amministrazione federale, in quanto decidano nell’adempimento d’un compito di diritto pubblico a essi affidato dalla Confederazione.

Nella procedura delle autorità cantonali di ultima istanza che non decidono definitivamente in virtù del diritto pubblico federale sono applicabili soltanto gli articoli 34 a 38 e 61 capoversi 2 e 3 concernenti la notificazione delle decisioni e l’articolo 55 capoversi 2 e 4 concernente la revoca dell’effetto sospensivo. È fatto salvo l’articolo 97 capoverso 2 della legge federale del 20 dicembre 1946 sull’assicurazione per la vecchiaia e per i superstiti concernente la revoca dell’effetto sospensivo a ricorsi contro le decisioni delle casse di compensazione.

Legge federale del 20 dicembre 1968 sulla procedura amministrativa (PA) Art. 2 PA →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (129)

RBOG.2003.Nr.17 · tg (Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. e VwVG)
Private Organization Decision Equivalence to Court Judgment in Debt Enforcement
The appellant is classified as an organization equivalent to a federal administrative authority in the sense of this provision.
VB.2001.00376 · zh (Art. 1 VwVG)
Informant Identity Disclosure in Commercial Register Access Dispute
Cited as a relevant procedural provision (although likely for application context rather than dispositive order, but included based on the text section listing applicable norms).
B-1612/2025 (Art. 1 Abs. 2 Bst. e VwVG)
Candidate Exclusion from Professional Exam is Appealable Intermediate Decision
Determines when organizations outside federal administration are considered authorities.
B-1627/2025 (Art. 1 Abs. 2 Bst. e VwVG)
SBFI Must Hear Appeal on Professional Qualification Exam
Includes organizations outside federal administration that act on behalf of federal public law as authorities under the Administrative Procedure Act.
B-1630/2025 (Art. 1 Abs. 2 Bst. e VwVG)
Candidate's Exclusion from Auditor Exam Upheld as Appealable Intermediate Decision
Includes organizations outside federal administration performing federal public tasks as authorities under the Administrative Procedure Act.
B-1632/2025 (Art. 1 Abs. 2 Bst. e VwVG)
Candidate Exclusion from Professional Examination, Direct Appeal Appropriate
Used to define that organizations outside federal administration exercising public federal duties are considered authorities.
B-2357/2025 (Art. 1 VwVG)
Appellant Fails Electrical Installation Exam Due to Insufficient Project Analysis Grade
The general law governing administrative proceedings in Switzerland.
C-7881/2024 (Art. 1 PA)
Federal Administrative Court Overturns Long COVID Disability Denial Due to Insufficient Medical Assessment
Cited in relation to the court's examination of its jurisdiction and the admissibility of appeals, and the duty to collaborate in the investigation.
RR.2025.54 (Art. 3 § 1 PA II CEExtr)
Extradition Appeal Rejected: Right to Fair Trial Not Violated by Italian Proceedings
The court considered whether the trial proceedings met minimum defense rights, a condition for refusing extradition of a person tried in absentia.
A/234/2025 · ge (art. 1 al. 3 PA)
Appeal on Benefit Cessation Denied Due to Pre-existing Conditions and Residence Abroad
Cited in the reasoning as the provision making specific articles of the PA applicable to the procedure before the cantonal authorities of final instance.
RR.2025.4 (art. 3 § 1 PA II CEExtr)
Federal Criminal Court Upholds Extradition Order for Fugitive
Cited in relation to the refusal of extradition when a trial in absentia has not respected minimum defense rights.
B-3445/2024 (Art. 1 Abs. 2 Bst. e VwVG)
Croatian Nurse's Professional Recognition in Switzerland Denied Automatic Equivalence
This provision is cited to qualify the respondent as an authority, thereby denying it legal costs.
C-3073/2024 (Art. 1 PA)
Federal Administrative Court Annuls Pension Revocation, Orders Further Review
Used to state that the proceedings before the Federal Administrative Court are governed by the PA.
A/2113/2024 · ge (Art. 1 al. 3 PA)
Insurance Benefits Suspension Appeal Procedural Ruling
Cited as the rule making Art. 55 para. 2 and 4 PA applicable to the proceedings.
C-2970/2024 (art. 22 cpv. 1, art. 23 PA in relazione con l'art. 37 LTAF e art. 1 cpv. 2 lett. cbis e 2 cpv. 4 PA)
Late Appeal Inadmissible Despite Judicial Holidays
Grounds for declaring the appeal inadmissible because it was filed late.