170.32
VGLRCFLResp
CH
CH
Art. 22 Legge federale del 14 marzo 1958 su la responsabilità della Confederazione, dei membri delle autorità federali e dei funzionari federali (LResp)
LResp; Capo VI. Prescrizione e perenzione
Art. 22 LResp
Per la prescrizione dell’azione penale, valgono le disposizioni del diritto penale.
La responsabilità disciplinare dei funzionari si estingue secondo le disposizioni disciplinari speciali, ma, al più tardi, in un anno dalla scoperta dell’atto indisciplinato, e, in ogni caso, nel termine di tre anni dall’ultima violazione dei doveri di servizio.
La prescrizione è sospesa finché duri il provvedimento penale promosso per il medesimo fatto oppure non si sia pronunciato su rimedi di diritto esercitati in un procedimento disciplinare.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (10)
601 2020 30 · fr (Art. 22 LResp)
Employee Liability Claim Barred by Finality of Prior Administrative Rulings
The court confirmed the decision based on this article, which prevents reviewing the legality of a decision that has acquired final legal force in a liability procedure.
12.2015.104 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Statute of Limitations and Mandatory Conciliation in Damages Claim Against Public Entity
This article, which refers to the Code of Civil Procedure for litigation against public entities, was central to the debate regarding the required procedural steps (conciliation vs. direct petition).
34.2012.36 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Occupational Pension Overpayment Dispute Transferred from Social Security Court
Cited regarding the transmission of the case to the competent authority.
12.2003.58 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Journalist's Claim Against Canton for Undue Use of Intercepts and Magistrate's Abstention
The court found sufficient grounds for mandatory abstention based on this article, even if not strictly covered by procedural rules.
53.1999.1 · ti (Art. 22 LResp)
Municipality v. Police Agent for Property Damage from Traffic Violation
Cited in the final ruling section as providing the jurisdictional basis for the Administrative Cantonal Tribunal.
53.1995.9 · ti (art. 22 LResp)
Municipality v. Former Tax Head: Gross Negligence in Tax Claim Submission
Cited as the basis for the Administrative Court's jurisdiction to decide on the liability action.
12.2003.58 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Claimant v. Canton: Recusal of Presiding Judge Based on Conflict of Interest with Council of Magistracy
The Tribunal concluded that there were sufficient grounds, not provided for in procedural rules, for the mandatory abstention of the ordinary civil judge based on this article.
12.2003.9 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Judge Recusal Due to Membership in Challenged Judicial Council
Cited in the reasoning but is NOT explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1-3).
12.2003.9 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 3 LResp)
Judge Recusal Due to Membership in Challenged Judicial Council
Cited in the reasoning but is NOT explicitly cited in the dispositive orders (1-3).
34.2012.36 · ti (art. 22 cpv. 1 LResp)
Insured's Claim for Legal Fees Against Pension Fund Not Within Cantonal Insurance Court Jurisdiction
Cited as part of the legal basis for the transmission of the case due to incompetence.