170.32 VGLRCFLResp

CH

Art. 1 Legge federale del 14 marzo 1958 su la responsabilità della Confederazione, dei membri delle autorità federali e dei funzionari federali (LResp)

LResp; Capo I. Campo d’applicazione

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (32 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 1 LResp

La presente legge è applicabile a tutte le persone cui è conferita una carica pubblica della Confederazione, quali: a. ... b. i membri del Consiglio federale e il Cancelliere della Confederazione; c. i membri e i supplenti dei Tribunali della Confederazione; cbis. i membri dell’autorità di vigilanza sul Ministero pubblico della Confederazione; d. i membri e i supplenti delle autorità e commissioni federali che non dipendano dai tribunali federali né dall’amministrazione federale; e. i funzionari e le altre persone occupate dalla Confederazione; f. tutte le altre persone, in quanto sia loro direttamente commesso un compito di diritto pubblico della Confederazione.

Sono eccettuate, per quanto concerne il loro stato militare e i loro doveri di servizio, le persone che appartengono all’esercito.

Legge federale del 14 marzo 1958 su la responsabilità della Confederazione, dei membri delle autorità federali e dei funzionari federali (LResp) Art. 2 LResp →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (10)

CDP.2020.113 · ne (Art. 1 LResp)

Applicants v. State: Failure to Detain Based on Warning

Cited in the reasoning to establish the basis for the public body's liability for acts of its agents, which is the core subject of the administrative law action.

VD.2015.46 · bs (Art. 120 Abs. 1 lit. c BGG i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 1 lit. c VG)

Appellant v. Canton Regarding State Liability for Former Federal Supreme Court Judges' Conduct

Cited in the reasoning section as an example of standard practice in Swiss law, but not in the final orders.

CDP.2013.229 · ne (Art. 1 al. 1 LResp)

Employee v. State Regarding Disability Reporting Failure

This article, defining the scope of the cantonal liability law, was cited in the reasoning, but it did not appear in the dispositive.

CDP.2013.229 · ne (Art. 1 al. 2 LResp)

Employee v. State Regarding Disability Reporting Failure

This article, defining the responsible public entity, was cited in the reasoning, but it did not appear in the dispositive.

A-2842/2008 (Art. 1 LResp)

Claim for damages against the Confederation rejected due to insufficient federal responsibility in gemstone seizure.

This provision was examined to determine if the Federal Liability Act applied to the case, specifically regarding whether the damage was caused by a federal official or someone entrusted with a public federal task.

BZ.2009.90 · sg (Art. 1 VG)

Municipality Not Liable for Faulty Building Setback Control

The court analyzed the general liability of municipalities for damages caused by their authorities in the exercise of their duties.

BZ.2009.90 · sg (Art. 1 VG)

Municipality Not Liable for Owner's Loss Due to Faulty Scaffolding Survey Oversight

The court dismissed the claim because, despite the breach of the control duty under the municipal building regulations, the municipality's conduct was not unlawful in the sense required for liability under this article.

JAAC 69.78 (Art. 1 Abs. 1 Bst. f VG)

Federal Government Not Liable for Development Fund Loan Dispute

Cited as a basis for the application of the State Liability Act to individuals entrusted with public tasks.

TA.2000.165 · ne (art.1 al.2 LResp)

Improper Exclusion from Public Contract and Procurement Liability

Used to establish that La Chaux-de-Fonds is a public body subject to the LResp.

34.2012.36 · ti (art. 1 cpv. 1 LResp)

Insured's Claim for Legal Fees Against Pension Fund Not Within Cantonal Insurance Court Jurisdiction

Cited as part of the legal basis for the transmission of the case due to incompetence.