152.3 BGÖLTransLTras

CH

Art. 8 Legge federale del 17 dicembre 2004 sul principio di trasparenza dell'amministrazione (LTras) - Casi particolari

LTras

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (25 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 8 LTras · Casi particolari

Non sussiste il diritto di accesso ai documenti ufficiali della procedura di corapporto.

I documenti ufficiali possono essere resi accessibili soltanto allorché la decisione politica o amministrativa per la quale costituiscono la base è stata presa.

Il Consiglio federale può eccezionalmente disporre che documenti ufficiali della procedura di consultazione degli Uffici non vengano resi accessibili nemmeno dopo la decisione.

L’accesso a documenti ufficiali concernenti posizioni relative a negoziati in corso o futuri è in ogni caso escluso.

L’accesso ai rapporti di valutazione dell’efficienza dell’Amministrazione federale e dell’efficacia delle sue misure è garantito.

← Art. 7 LTras Legge federale del 17 dicembre 2004 sul principio di trasparenza dell'amministrazione (LTras) - Scopo e oggetto Art. 9 LTras →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (103)

EDÖB · Recommandation du 10 (art. 8 LTrans)

Journalist Access to Trade Negotiation Records Granted Despite Government Objections

Cited in the dispositive as a special case whose applicability could not be proven by the SECO, leading to the recommendation of full access.

EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 7 Ap (Art. 8 BGÖ)

Journalist vs. SECO: Access to Trade Dispute Documents

The court is recommending full access because the authority could not prove the applicability of a special case.

EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 6 Fe (Art. 8 Abs. 1 BGÖ)

Federal Chancellery v. Applicants (Referendum Initiative Document Access)

Used to determine that documents from the consultation procedure are generally not subject to access rights.

EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 13 J (Art. 8 Abs. 4 BGÖ)

Federal Office of Justice v. Third-Party Access Request

Cited by the Federal Office of Justice as an exception to access, but its applicability was not sufficiently proven.

EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 13 A (Art. 8 Abs. 2 BGÖ)

Commodity Trading Companies v. Environmental Agency: Access to Climate Agreement Documents

This provision allows for the deferral of access to documents until a decision is made, but the court found that the agency did not provide sufficient justification for its application.

EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 18 A (Art. 8 Abs. 2 BGÖ)

Commission v. Individual over Legal Documents and Budget Information

This article was invoked by the EKQMB as an exception to public access, but the Commissioner found it not sufficiently substantiated.

EDÖB · Recommandation du 4 (Art. 8 al. 2 LTrans)

Access to Railway Devis Granted After Privacy Commissioner Recommendation

Cited as a potential ground for refusing access to official documents, related to decisions yet to be made.

EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 20 D (Art. 8 BGÖ)

Access to Myanmar Sanctions Memo and Draft Regulation

Cited as a potential ground for exceptions to access, requiring further examination by SECO.

EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 18 O (Art. 8 Abs. 2 BGÖ)

Federal Agency v. Access to Tram Line Route Documents

Cited by the BBL as a ground for refusing access, but ultimately not applied by the conciliator.

EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 18 10 (Art. 8 Abs. 2 BGÖ)

Journalist v. BBL: Access to Tram Line Emails

Used to deny the request for access to documents as the conditions for delaying disclosure until after a political or administrative decision has been made were not met.

EDÖB · GS VBS Protokolle (Art. 8 Abs. 2 BGÖ)

Ministry of Defence v. Access to Tank Deal Documents

Cited by the GS VBS as a ground for delaying access to documents, but found not sufficiently substantiated by the EDÖB.

EDÖB · BAK Bericht Kinde (Art. 8 Abs. 2 BGÖ)

Federal Office of Culture v. Swiss Federal Data Protection and Information Commissioner

Cited by the Federal Office of Culture as a reason for deferring access, but ultimately not applied by the EDÖB.

EDÖB · GS EFD Screenshots (Art. 8 Abs. 1 BGÖ)

Journalist vs. Federal Department of Finance on "CS Complex" Documents

Cited as a potential ground for withholding access to documents from the consultation process, but the argument was not sufficiently substantiated.

EDÖB · GS EFD Screenshots (Art. 8 Abs. 2 BGÖ)

Journalist vs. Federal Department of Finance on "CS Complex" Documents

Cited for the deferral of access to documents until a political or administrative decision is made, but determined not to be applicable in this case.

EDÖB · GS EDI Dokumente b (Art. 8 Abs. 1 BGÖ)

Journalist's Access to Federal Council Working Group Documents

This provision is cited as the basis for denying access to documents related to the Federal Council's deliberation process.