152.3
BGÖLTransLTras
CH
CH
Art. 7 Legge federale del 17 dicembre 2004 sul principio di trasparenza dell'amministrazione (LTras) - Eccezioni
LTras
Art. 7 LTras · Eccezioni
Il diritto di accesso a un documento ufficiale è limitato, differito o negato se può: a. ledere in modo considerevole la libera formazione dell’opinione e della volontà di un’autorità soggetta alla presente legge, di un altro organo legislativo o amministrativo o di un’autorità giudiziaria; b. perturbare l’esecuzione appropriata di misure concrete di un’autorità; c. compromettere la sicurezza interna o esterna della Svizzera; d. compromettere gli interessi della politica estera o le relazioni internazionali della Svizzera; e. compromettere i rapporti tra la Confederazione e i Cantoni o tra i Cantoni; f. compromettere gli interessi della politica economica o monetaria della Svizzera; g. comportare la rivelazione di segreti professionali, di fabbricazione o d’affari; h. far sì che vengano divulgate informazioni fornite liberamente da terzi a un’autorità che ne ha garantito il segreto.
Il diritto di accesso è altresì limitato, differito o negato se può ledere la sfera privata di terzi; eccezionalmente può tuttavia prevalere l’interesse pubblico all’accesso.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (683)
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 10 J (Art. 7 Abs. 1 Bst. g BGÖ)
Federal Office of Culture v. Journalist (Literary Estate Purchase Prices)
Cited by the Federal Office of Culture as a ground for refusing access to information, but the reviewer found that the conditions for this exception were not sufficiently demonstrated.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 10 J (Art. 7 Abs. 1 Bst. h BGÖ)
Federal Office of Culture v. Journalist (Literary Estate Purchase Prices)
Cited by the Federal Office of Culture as a ground for refusing access to information, but the reviewer found that the conditions for this exception were not met.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 10 J (Art. 7 Abs. 2 BGÖ)
Federal Office of Culture v. Journalist (Literary Estate Purchase Prices)
Cited by the Federal Office of Culture as a ground for refusing access to information, but the reviewer found that the public interest outweighed the private interests, or that the private interests were not sufficiently demonstrated.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 28 M (Art. 7 Abs. 1 Bst. g BGÖ)
Drug Approval Documents: Trade Secret Claim Denied
Cited by the applicant as the legal basis for the protection of business and trade secrets, which they invoked to request the integral rejection of the access request.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 10 A (Art. 7 BGÖ)
Journalist Denied Access to Dispute Resolution Documents
Cited as the basis for the decision regarding the non-applicability of the Openness Act and the inability to prove the existence of an exception.
EDÖB · Recommandation du 10 (art. 7 LTrans)
Journalist Access to Trade Negotiation Records Granted Despite Government Objections
Cited in the dispositive as a provision whose applicability could not be proven by the SECO, leading to the recommendation of full access.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 7 Ap (Art. 7 BGÖ)
Journalist vs. SECO: Access to Trade Dispute Documents
The court is recommending full access because the authority could not prove the applicability of an exception.
EDÖB · Dokumente betreffend (Art. 7 Abs. 1 Bst. c BGÖ)
Swiss Federal Police Disclosure Denied on National Security Grounds
Used to justify the complete refusal of access to documents due to potential endangerment of internal or external security.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 2 M (Art. 7 Abs. 1 Bst. c BGÖ)
Federal Intelligence Service v. Disclosure of Foreign Intelligence Letters
Cited as a basis for restricting, postponing, or denying access to official documents when their disclosure could endanger Switzerland's internal or external security.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 2 M (Art. 7 Abs. 1 Bst. d BGÖ)
Federal Intelligence Service v. Disclosure of Foreign Intelligence Letters
Cited as a basis for restricting, postponing, or denying access to official documents when their disclosure could impair Switzerland's foreign policy interests or international relations.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 13 J (Art. 7 Abs. 1 Bst. a BGÖ)
Federal Office of Justice v. Third-Party Access Request
Cited by the Federal Office of Justice as an exception to access, but its applicability was not sufficiently proven.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 6 Ja (Art. 7 Abs. 1 Bst. a BGÖ)
Journalist's Email Access Denial Regarding Fighter Jet Procurement Upheld by Supervisory Authority
The court considered whether this provision allows for the postponement of access to documents due to potential impairment of free formation of opinion and will.
EDÖB · Recommandation du 10 (Art. 7 al. 1 let. g LTrans)
Federal Institute's Contract Redactions Under Scrutiny
Cited as the exception for withholding information due to business or manufacturing secrets, but the court found it not sufficiently demonstrated.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 2 12 (Art. 7 Abs. 1 Bst. c BGÖ)
Access to Export Permits for Military Goods to Israel
Cited by the applicant as a potential ground for refusal concerning the protection of national security. The applicant was deemed not legitimate to invoke this provision as it protects public interests, not private ones.
EDÖB · Empfehlung vom 2 12 (Art. 7 Abs. 1 Bst. g BGÖ)
Access to Export Permits for Military Goods to Israel
Cited as the primary ground for refusal by the applicant, the provision concerns the protection of business and trade secrets. The article was discussed extensively in the reasoning but ultimately not applied in the recommendation, as the applicant failed to provide sufficient evidence for its applicability.