131.212 KV

CH

Art. 5 Costituzione del Cantone di Berna, (CostC)

CostC; 1 Principi generali; Giura Bernese

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (144 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 5 CostC

Al Giura Bernese, che forma la regione amministrativa del Giura Bernese, è riconosciuto uno statuto particolare. Questo statuto deve consentire al Giura Bernese di preservare la propria identità, di conservare la propria specificità linguistica e culturale e di partecipare attivamente alla politica cantonale.

Il Cantone prende provvedimenti per rafforzare i legami tra il Giura Bernese e la parte restante del Cantone.

← Art. 4 CostC Costituzione del Cantone di Berna, (CostC) Art. 6 CostC →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (14)

VR1 2025 21 · gr (Art. 5 Abs. 2 KV)

Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Traffic Restriction on Access Road

This cantonal constitutional provision regarding the requirement for public interest was cited in the reasoning to justify the restriction.

U 2024 23 · gr (Art. 5 Abs. 2 KV)

Transport Company v. Municipality on Truck Traffic Restriction

Cited as the cantonal constitutional principle requiring public action to be based on a public interest, applied when assessing the legality of the traffic restriction.

U 2023 89 · gr (Art. 5 Abs. 2 KV)

Resident Appeal Against Traffic Ban on Historically Protected Road Dismissed

The court references this constitutional provision in E. 3.3.3 and E. 3.6 regarding the proportionality of the administrative action, finding the restriction justified.

VD.2022.126 · bs (§ 5 Abs. 1, § 8 Abs. 1 und § 10 der Kantonsverfassung des Kantons Basel-Stadt (KV))

Cultural Enterprise v. Insurer Regarding COVID-19 Business Interruption Compensation

Cited as cantonal constitutional provisions allegedly violated by the improper retroactive application of the maximum cap.

VWBES.2019.403 · so (Art. 5 Abs. 2 Verfassung des Kantons Solothurn, KV, BGS 111.1)

Applicant v. Administrative Authority on Social Assistance File Closure

Cited in the reasoning section to support the application of the principle of good faith, though not directly used in the final dispositive orders (other than the dismissal).

VD.2019.177 · bs (§ 5 Abs. 2 KV)

Police Employee Termination Upheld for Unauthorized Database Access

Cited in the reasoning concerning proportionality, but not explicitly in the dispositive order to rule on the appeal itself.

VWBES.2017.163 · so (Art. 5 Abs. 2 der Solothurnischen Kantonsverfassung (KV, BGS 111.1))

Appeal Regarding Hotel Courtyard Design and Noise Dismissed Due to Lack of Interest and Contradictory Conduct

The court considered the appellant's renewed appeal an infringement of good faith (Treu und Glauben) based on this provision.

VD.2017.109 · bs (§ 5 Abs. 3 KV)

Police Officers v. Administrative Decision on Service Vehicle Entitlement

Cited in reasoning regarding the general obligation for state organs and private parties to act in good faith.

VWBES.2016.429 · so (Art. 5 KV)

Fustlighalde Perimeter Contribution Dispute on Road, Water, and Sewer Infrastructure

Cited in the reasoning in connection with the principle of good faith (Treu und Glauben) concerning private parties' conduct towards state bodies.

VD.2016.75 · bs (§ 5 Abs. 1 der Kantonsverfassung (KV; SG 111.100))

Employee Termination Based on Prolonged Incapacity Overruled Due to Statutory Interpretation

Cited in the reasoning section (E. 3.3.7) to support the requirement for legal certainty due to the direct effect of § 34 PG.

VD.2014.17 · bs (§ 5 Abs. 2 KV)

Taxi Operator License Revocation Overturned Due to Disproportionate Debt Consideration

Cited as the cantonal equivalent of the general principle that administrative action is subject to proportionality.

OG ARGVP 2010 2290 · ar (Art. 5 Abs. 1 kV zum EntsG)

Employer Fine Annulment Due to Lack of Legal Basis for Penal Authority and Unsubstantiated Control Costs

This provision, which delegated penal authority, was annulled because it violated formal statutory requirements (Art. 1 StPO and Art. 69 KV).

VWKLA.2007.16 · so (Art. 5 Abs. 2 KV)

Childbirth Complications Damages Claim: Forfeiture Period Misapplication and Proper Defendant Determination

The principle of good faith derived from this article was used to consider the claim as timely despite the expiration of the forfeiture period.

VD.2023.56 · bs (§ 5 Abs. 1 KV)

Energy Saving Bonus Forfeiture Deadline Validity

Cited in the context of the legality principle in Cantonal law.