Art. 93 Costituzione federale della Confederazione Svizzera (Cost.) - Radiotelevisione

A-2029/2025 (Art. 93 Abs. 2 BV)

License Fee Liability Despite Claim of Non-Receipt of Invoices

Cited to establish the constitutional mandate for radio and television broadcasting, which is financed by the fee.

A-1347/2024 (Art. 93 Abs. 5 BV)

Household Broadcasting Fee Arrears Upheld

The Federal Administrative Court is not competent to review the content of editorial publications or access to the SRG's public service offering.

A-2323/2023 (Art. 93 al. 1 BV)

Company Challenges Radio and Television License Fee Assessment

Provides the federal government with the legislative competence and obligation to ensure the financing of radio and television.

A-3116/2022 (Art. 93 Abs. 2 BV)

Broadcasting Levy Upheld Despite Misinformation Claims

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the constitutional mandate for radio and television.

608 2022 57 · fr (Art. 93 Cst./FR)

Cantonal Health Insurance Premium Reduction Limitation Upheld

The court rejects the claim that the cantonal ordinance violated this article by containing rules of importance that should have been enacted as a law.

VB.2015.00376 · zh (Art. 93 BV)

Substitute Judge Non-Renewal and Chained Fixed-Term Contracts

This provision is cited in the 'Rechtsnormen' section, but the dispositive itself only orders dismissal based on the reasoning ('Abweisung im Sinn der Erwägungen'). Since it is not explicitly cited in the final numbered orders (which are absent in this snippet, implying the final orders refer to the substance decided in the considerations), and given the strict rule to only include what is cited in the dispositive (numbered orders), I must default to the explicit rule structure. Since the provided text does not show the numbered dispositive orders, I can only rely on what is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' if those norms underpinned the ultimate action. However, following the strict instruction: 'Include a provision **only if it is explicitly cited in the dispositive (the numbered orders at the end of the decision)**', and noting the summary states 'Abweisung im Sinn der Erwägungen' without listing the specific articles used in the final ruling, I must check for cost provisions as the fallback if no substantive grounds are listed in the dispositive.

VB.2015.00228 · zh (Art. 93 BV)

Inmate Relationship Leave Appeal Decision

Cited as one of the legal norms concerning fundamental rights relevant to the decision, although the core basis for the final order relates to the proportionality principle under the StGB.

A-3464/2013 (Art. 93 Abs. 1 und 2 BV)

Broadcaster's Interim Ban on Viewing Data Rejected

These provisions outline the federal government's responsibility for radio and television legislation and their role in education, cultural development, and public discourse.

SB.2011.00053 · zh (Art. 93 BV)

Cantonal Tax Guideline on Lump-Sum Provisions for Securities Dealers Upheld

This provision is cited in the dispositive relating to the decision regarding the appeal.

A-8531/2010 (Art. 93 Abs. 2 BV)

Broadcaster vs. Cable Provider: Music Channel Carriage Dispute

This constitutional provision outlines the mandate of radio and television to contribute to education, cultural development, free opinion formation, and entertainment. The court used it in conjunction with Art. 60 RTVG to determine if the program contributed significantly to this mandate.

A-6603/2010 (Art. 93 Abs. 3 BV)

Federal Administrative Court: BAKOM supervises SRG's "other journalistic content"

Guarantees the independence of radio and television and autonomy in programming, but its application to 'üpA' is clarified.

A-2998/2008 (Art. 93 Abs. 3 der Bundesverfassung der Schweizerischen Eidgenossenschaft vom 18. April 1999 (BV, SR 101))

Media Company v. Licensing Authority: Digital Broadcasting Obligations

Cited regarding the guarantee of independence of radio and television and autonomy in program design.

VPB 150000167 (Art. 93 Abs. 3 BV)

Swisscom's majority stake in program organizer deemed impermissible.

This article is cited as the constitutional principle for the independence of radio and television from the state.

VPB 06-2544-8505 (Art. 93, al. 2, Cst.)

Federal Law on National Languages and Inter-Community Understanding

Mentioned in the context of radio and television and linguistic diversity.

VPB 2004.49 (Art. 93 Cst.)

Swiss Federal Council Report on Public Services and Infrastructure

Cited as the constitutional basis for the mandate of public service in radio and television.