168.11 KAGLA

CH-BE

Art. 36 Legge Cantonale sugli Avvocati (LCA) - Rimborso delle Spese della Parte e Indennità di Parte

Supervisione disciplinare

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (51 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 36 Legge Cantonale sugli Avvocati (LCA) · Rimborso delle Spese della Parte e Indennità di Parte

1. Se viene accertata una violazione delle regole professionali, l'avvocato non ha diritto al risarcimento delle spese di parte né all'indennizzo di parte.

2. Se si rinuncia all'apertura di un procedimento, l'avvocato di norma non ha diritto al risarcimento delle spese di parte né all'indennizzo di parte.

3. Se il procedimento viene annullato, l'avvocato ha diritto a un indennizzo di parte adeguato. Si ha diritto al risarcimento delle spese di parte solo se, a causa della gravità delle accuse, era necessaria una rappresentanza legale.

4. Il risarcimento delle spese di parte e l'indennizzo di parte possono essere rifiutati o ridotti se l'avvocato ha provocato il procedimento con dolo o colpa grave, o ha reso difficile la sua esecuzione in modo legalmente censurabile.

5. La persona denunciante può essere obbligata a pagare il risarcimento delle spese di parte o l'indennizzo di parte se ha agito con dolo o colpa grave.

← Art. 35 Legge cantonale sugli avvocati (LCA) - Costi di procedimento Brevetto di avvocato, esame di avvocato e colloquio d'esame Art. 37 Legge cantonale sugli avvocati (LCA) - Domanda →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (45)

100 2025 40 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 3 KAG)

Attorney Disciplinary Fine Overturned for Substantial Inactivity Lacking Gross Violation Status

Applied to grant the appellant an expense allowance (Parteientschädigung) for the proceedings before the Disciplinary Authority.

100 2025 40 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 5 KAG)

Attorney Disciplinary Fine Overturned for Substantial Inactivity Lacking Gross Violation Status

Applied to decide that the cost of the proceedings before the Disciplinary Authority (granting the allowance) should be borne by the Canton because the complainant did not act maliciously or grossly negligently.

AA 2025 27 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Violation of Practice Ban in Social Insurance Courts

Cited as the basis for denying the appellant any claim for reimbursement of party costs.

AA 2024 224 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Attorney Sanctioned for Using Illegally Obtained Medical Reports

This article was cited in order No. 3 to deny any compensation for party costs or indemnity, given the finding of a professional violation.

AA 2024 250 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Attorney Conflict of Interest Violation in Simultaneous Representation

This provision was cited regarding the non-entitlement of the penalized attorney to compensation for party costs.

AA 2017 72 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Attorney Discipline for Accomplice to Qualified Kidnapping

This article was cited to justify the non-awarding of party compensation.

AA 2024 241 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Attorney Sanctioned for Breach of Professional Secrecy via Mistaken Data Submission

Rule establishing that there is no claim for party cost reimbursement or compensation.

AA 2024 86 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Disciplinary Fine for Negligent Mandate Management

Applied to rule against awarding the respondent costs or compensation as a result of the established professional rule violation.

AA 2023 283 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Attorney Forgery Conviction Justifies Professional Suspension

It was ruled that the disciplinary respondent is not entitled to party costs/compensation based on this article.

AA 2023 252 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Lawyer Disciplined for Inattentiveness During Client Interrogation

This provision was cited to deny compensation for party costs/indemnities.

AA 2023 279 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Attorney Reprimanded for Conflict of Interest Due to Shared Firm Association

This article was used to deny the disciplinary respondent compensation for party costs or indemnity.

200 2023 234 · be (art. 36 al. 1 et 2 de la loi cantonale du 1er février 2012 sur la protection de l'enfant et de l'adulte (LPEA, RSB 213.316))

Beneficiary Challenge to Supplementary Benefit Calculation Based on Asset Date

Cited in reasoning 6.2 as basis for calculating the curator's indemnity, relating to disposition 3.

AA 2022 191 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Disciplinary Action Against Lawyer for Meritless Litigation and Defamation of Judges

Used to deny the Applicant any entitlement to party cost compensation because a violation of professional rules was established.

AA 2023 150 · be (Art. 36 al. 1 LA)

Attorney Sanctioned for Aggressive and Unsubstantiated Accusations Against Authority

Cited to state that the respondent is not entitled to reimbursement of costs or party compensation because a violation was found.

AA 2023 91 · be (Art. 36 Abs. 1 KAG)

Attorney Suspension for Repeated Professional Negligence

Cited as the basis for denying the disciplinary respondent compensation for party costs because professional rules were violated.