155.21
VRPGLPJALGA
CH-BE
CH-BE
Art. 97 Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPGA) - Domanda di revisione
Mezzi straordinari di impugnazione e rimedi legali - Revisione
Art. 97 Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPGA) - Domanda di revisione · Domanda di revisione
1. L'istanza di revisione deve essere presentata all'autorità giudiziaria amministrativa, la cui decisione si intende rivedere.
2. Nell'istanza deve essere specificato quale modifica della decisione precedente si richiede e, se del caso, quali restituzioni.
3. Inoltre, nell'istanza di revisione devono essere esposti, nel rispetto delle disposizioni formali di cui all'articolo 32, il motivo della revisione e la sua tempestiva rivendicazione.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (7)
200 2017 947 · be (Art. 97 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Claimant's Untimely Request for Revision of Accident Insurance Denial Based on Allegedly Non-Existent Medical Documentation
Cited alongside federal law to establish the court's jurisdiction to rule on the revision request.
200 2025 465 · be (Art. 97 Abs. 1-3 VRPG)
Dismissal of Revision Request for Procedural Deficiencies
The court decided not to proceed with the revision request because it did not meet the formal requirements outlined in these articles.
100 2024 219 · be (Art. 97 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Revision Denied: Plot Division Known During Original Proceedings
Cited in relation to which body assesses the appeal (though the result is reached under Art. 95 VRPG).
100 2024 219 · be (Art. 97 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Revision Denied: Plot Division Known During Original Proceedings
Cited in the reasoning section discussing the jurisdiction for treating a revision request, though the final disposition mostly relies on the outcome decided under subsequent provisions.
200 2021 697 · be (Art. 97 VRPG)
Pension Revision Request Dismissed for Lack of New, Relevant Facts
Applied because the non-admittance of the appeal was based on unfulfilled formal requirements for the revision request.
200 2016 986 · be (art. 97 al. 1 LPJA)
Insurance Benefit Revision Denial Based on Untimely Medical Evidence
This article was cited in the reasoning (c. 2.3) for declaring the revision request inadmissible, echoing the substantive rejection grounded in the lack of new facts/evidence.
200 2013 458 · be (Art. 97 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Healthcare Provider's Attempt to Revise Exclusion from Mandatory Insurance Fails Due to Untimely and Insufficient New Evidence
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the requirement to substantiate the grounds for revision.