155.21 VRPGLPJALGA

CH-BE

Art. 95 Legge sulla Procedura Amministrativa (LPAm) - Motivi

Mezzi Straordinari di Impugnazione - Ricorso per Cassazione

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (140 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 95 Legge sulla Procedura Amministrativa (LPAm) · Motivi

1. Una decisione definitiva di un'autorità di giustizia amministrativa può essere modificata o annullata su richiesta, se

a un procedimento penale ha dimostrato che la decisione è stata influenzata da un crimine o reato a danno della parte; se il procedimento penale non può essere eseguito, la prova può essere fornita in altro modo,

b la parte viene a conoscenza successivamente di fatti significativi o trova mezzi di prova decisivi che non poteva presentare nel procedimento precedente, con esclusione di quelli sorti dopo la decisione in questione.

← Art. 94 Legge sulla Giustizia Amministrativa (LGA) - Procedimento 1. Fondamenti - Ambito di Applicazione Art. 96 Legge sulla Procedura Amministrativa (LPAm) - Termine →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (10)

200 2025 465 · be (Art. 95 Abs. 1 VRPG)

Dismissal of Revision Request for Procedural Deficiencies

Although the merits of the revision were examined, the court ultimately did not base its decision on this article, as the applicant failed to substantiate the required grounds (lit. a and lit. b).

100 2024 219 · be (Art. 95 Abs. 1 Bst. b VRPG)

Revision Denied: Plot Division Known During Original Proceedings

The main ground examined for rejecting the revision request (failure to meet the criteria for newly discovered relevant facts/evidence).

200 2024 620 · be (Art. 95 ff. VRPG)

Welfare Office Benefit Determination Objection Jurisdiction Transfer

Implicitly applied in the dispositive point 1 as the reasoning cites these articles for classifying one part of the complaint as a Revision request.

100 2024 174 · be (Art. 95 Bst. b VRPG)

Social Assistance Repayment Revision Denied Due to Post-Decision Acquittal

Cited as the legal basis for dismissing the revision request because the alleged new evidence (the criminal court acquittal) was not in existence at the time of the decision being reviewed.

200 2023 551 · be (Art. 95 VRPG)

Social Assistance Reduction Based on Alleged Cohabitation Upheld in Part, Full Entitlement Reinstated Post-2022

Cited in the reasoning (Point 1.2.4) concerning the procedure for revision, which was relevant to excluding the September 2022 claims outside of the appeal.

200 2022 449 · be (Art. 95 lit. b VRPG)

Disability Benefits Revision Denied Due to Untimely and Inadmissible New Evidence

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the new evidence did not meet the legal requirements for revision under cantonal law, although the non-admission stems from procedural failure (Art. 96 Abs. 1 VRPG).

195 2021 22 · be (Art. 95 al 1 LPJA)

Appeal Dismissed for Inadmissible Revision Request Concerning Unlawful Structure Removal

This provision defining the grounds for revision was cited in the reasoning but the final order declared the request inadmissible without explicitly using this article to justify the inadmissibility in the dispositive.

200 2020 879 · be (Art. 95 lit. b VRPG)

Pension Revision Based on Post-Judgment Acquittal and Report Denied

The appeal was dismissed because the grounds for revision raised by the applicant did not meet the criteria set out in this article (new evidence produced after the contested decision).

200 2017 793 · be (Art. 95 VRPG)

Disability Benefits Denial Upheld Despite New Lupus Diagnosis

This article defines the grounds for revision, which were analyzed, leading to the dismissal of the application in order 1.

200 2013 458 · be (Art. 95 VRPG)

Healthcare Provider's Attempt to Revise Exclusion from Mandatory Insurance Fails Due to Untimely and Insufficient New Evidence

Cited in the reasoning section as the basis for revision grounds, which were subsequently found not to be met, leading to the non-admission in order 1.