143.1 VRPG

CH-AR

Art. 8 Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (VRPG) - Astensione

1. Sezione: Disposizioni Generali

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (58 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 8 VRPG - Astensione · Astensione

1. Persone che devono prendere o preparare una decisione sono tenute ad astenersi

a) * se hanno un interesse personale nella questione;

abis) * se sono imparentate o affini con una parte in linea diretta o fino al terzo grado in linea collaterale, o se sono legate tramite matrimonio, unione registrata o convivenza di fatto;

b) se hanno già partecipato alla decisione preliminare;

c) se rappresentano una parte o hanno già agito per una parte nella stessa questione;

d) se sono significativamente interessate al risultato in questione riguardante una persona giuridica;

e) se per altri motivi potrebbero trovarsi in conflitto d'interessi nella questione.

2. Se l'astensione è controversa, decide l'autorità collegiale, escludendo la persona interessata, o, per le persone singole, il tribunale di appello, mentre per il giudice unico dell'Alta Corte, decide l'Alta Corte.

3. Se come conseguenza di una richiesta di astensione viene messa in dubbio la capacità deliberativa di un'autorità, decide sulla controversa astensione

a) per il consiglio comunale, il consiglio di governo,

b) * per il consiglio di governo, l'Alta Corte.

c) * ...

4. Per l'Alta Corte si applica l'art. 47 lett. e della Legge sulla giustizia[2].

← Art. 7 VRPG - d) Sospensione dei termini Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (VRPG) - Ambito di applicazione Art. 9 VRPG - Rappresentanza e Tutela →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (10)

Verwaltung ARGVP 202 · ar (Art. 8 Abs. 3 lit. a VRPG)

Municipal Council Recusal Challenge and Quorum Determination

Cited to establish the Government Council's jurisdiction to decide on the challenged abstention request because the council's quorum was questioned.

OG O4V 19 34 ARGVP 2 · ar (Art. 8 Abs. 1 lit. d VRPG)

Municipal Executive Recused from Stock Corporation Administrative Proceedings Due to Objective Bias Risk

The member of the municipal executive was deemed personally biased under this provision due to his position on the board of directors of the company concerned.

OG O4V 19 34 · ar (Art. 8 Abs. 1 lit. d VRPG)

Planning Zone Challenge Based on Council Member's Dual Role and Apparent Bias

The court found the council president personally biased according to this provision.

OG O4V 19 36 · ar (Art. 8 Abs. 1 lit. d VRPG)

Appeal Regarding Planning Zone Imposition Due to Official's Conflict of Interest

Cited in the reasoning leading to the conclusion that the municipal president was personally biased, which formed the basis for the annulment of the prior decisions.

OG O4V 19 38 · ar (Art. 8 Abs. 1 lit. d VRPG)

Property Owners v. Municipal Council Over Planning Zone Decision Due to Conflict of Interest

The court found the municipal president personally biased in the sense of this provision regarding the decision.

OG O4V 19 40 · ar (Art. 8 Abs. 1 lit. d VRPG)

Planning Zone Challenge Based on Municipal President's Conflict of Interest

Used to establish that C. ______ was personally biased in the preliminary decision (Einspracheverfahren) based on his interest as a member of the board of D. ______.

OG O4V 19 17 · ar (Art. 8 Abs. 1 lit. b VRPG)

Application for Recusal of Court Clerk Based on Prior Administrative Role Dismissed

This provision defines the grounds for recusation, specifically participation in the prior decision, which was central to the applicant's motion.

OG O4V 19 17 · ar (Art. 8 Abs. 1 lit. e VRPG)

Application for Recusal of Court Clerk Based on Prior Administrative Role Dismissed

This general catch-all provision for potential bias was examined as an alternative ground for recusation.

OG O4V 17 27 · ar (Art. 8 Abs. 2 VRPG)

Motion to Disqualify High Court Vice President Denied Due to Lack of Objective Evidence of Bias

Cited in the reasoning as the procedural rule determining which authority decides on the abstention request, which is the basis for the court's jurisdiction.

O4V 23 7 · ar (Art. 8 Abs. 1 lit. e VRPG)

Veterinary Inspector Recusal Challenge Dismissed Due to Untimely Filing and Improper Appeal Structure

Mentioned in reasoning regarding the scope of the partial withdrawal, but not explicitly used in the final orders.