150.960
IVÖB
CH-AG
CH-AG
Art. 56 Concordato intercantonale sugli appalti pubblici (IVöB) - Termine di ricorso, motivi di ricorso e legittimazione
Protezione Giuridica
Art. 56 IVöB - Termine di ricorso, motivi di ricorso e legittimazione · Termine di ricorso, motivi di ricorso e legittimazione
1. I reclami devono essere presentati per iscritto e motivati entro 20 giorni dalla notifica della decisione.
2. Non sono previste sospensioni dei termini giudiziari.
3. Con il reclamo possono essere contestati
a) le violazioni di legge, inclusa l'eccessiva discrezionalità o l'abuso della stessa; nonché
b) l'errata o incompleta determinazione dei fatti rilevanti ai fini giuridici.
4. La proporzionalità di una decisione non può essere esaminata nell'ambito di un procedimento di reclamo.
5. Possono presentare reclamo contro le aggiudicazioni in procedura negoziata diretta solo coloro che dimostrano di poter fornire le prestazioni richieste o prestazioni sostituibili e di volerle fornire. Si può contestare solo che la procedura negoziata sia stata applicata ingiustamente o che l'aggiudicazione sia stata conferita a causa di corruzione.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (18)
WBE.2025.203 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Appealing Bidder v. Municipality re: Wood Chipper Ownership
Defines the scope of review for appeals to the administrative court, allowing claims of legal violations and incorrect or incomplete factual findings.
WBE.2025.129 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB)
Home care contract award upheld due to expired appeal window.
Cited as the basis for the 20-day appeal period, which the court found to have expired.
WBE.2025.131 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Challenged Award Decision Due to Insufficient Justification and Evaluation
Allows for the assertion of legal violations, including abuse of discretion, and incorrect or incomplete determination of the relevant factual situation.
WBE.2025.8 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Public Works Bid Challenge: Procedural Flaw Insufficient, Price Evaluation Error Leads to Annulment
This provision defines the scope of review for appeals against decisions in public procurement law, allowing for the assertion of legal violations and factual errors.
WBE.2024.228 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Contract Award Overturned Due to Insufficient Reference Verification
Cited as the legal basis for the types of violations that can be raised in an appeal to the Administrative Court.
WBE.2024.183 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Waste Collection Contract Award Unlawful Due to Flat Price Evaluation Curve
Defines the grounds for appeal to the administrative court, including legal violations and incorrect factual findings.
WBE.2024.129 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Contract Award Annulled Due to Bidder's Prior Involvement and Formal Defect
Cited to establish the grounds for appeal to the administrative court, allowing the assertion of legal violations and incorrect factual findings.
WBE.2024.220 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Procurement Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Specificity
The court noted that legal violations, including abuse of discretion and incorrect or incomplete factual findings, can be asserted in an appeal.
WBE.2024.125 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Public Procurement Authority's Cancellation of Bidding Process Upheld After Unlawful Award
These provisions relate to the grounds for appeal, which are discussed in the reasoning but not directly cited in the dispositive orders.
WBE.2023.300 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Public Contract Award Upheld Despite Qualification Challenge
This provision allowed for the appeal to the administrative court based on alleged legal violations and incorrect factual findings.
WBE.2023.371 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Contract Award Annulled Due to Flawed Bid Evaluation
These provisions define the grounds for appeal to the administrative court, which the court found applicable to the case.
WBE.2023.178 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB i.V.m. § 43 VRPG)
Public Tender Lighting Fixtures Appeal Dismissed for Lack of Formal Appeal
Used to declare the appeal inadmissible because it did not meet the requirements of a formal appeal.
VBE.2022.455 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB)
Bidder Exclusion and Contract Award for Tunnel Spoil Transport
Cited regarding the formal requirements and deadline (20 days) for submitting an administrative appeal.
VBE.2022.455 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 IVöB)
Bidder Exclusion and Contract Award for Tunnel Spoil Transport
Cited as the basis allowing the complainants to challenge legal violations, including discretion abuse, in their appeal.
WBE.2022.488 · ag (Art. 56 Abs. 3 lit. a und b IVöB)
Bidder Exclusion Upheld Due to Incomplete Bid
Cited to outline the grounds for appeal to the Administrative Court, including violations of law and incorrect factual findings.