Legislator European & Swiss Legal Corpus
DE FR IT EN
Court Decisions Legislation Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 4176/2013 Allowed / Granted AI-structured

Încheierea nr. 4176/2013 — Civil case venue transfer between appellate courts preserving procedural acts

Case Number Încheierea nr. 4176/2013 (ICCJ_99908)
Court / Authority
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Jurisdiction Romania — Case Law (RO)
Open official source ↗ Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Decision Summary (Facts, Holding & Outcome)

AI-structured

The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the petition, ordering the transfer of the civil proceedings from the Ploiești Court of Appeal to the Târgu Mureș Court of Appeal while preserving all procedural acts already performed. The dispute involved a request for the venue transfer (strămutare) of a civil case currently pending before the Ploieși Court of Appeal, Civil Section I, with the petitioner seeking a change of jurisdiction based on grounds supported by oral submissions and supplementary documents filed on September 30, 2013. The decision relied on the procedural legal basis for transfer of jurisdiction, supported by the prosecution’s conclusions recommending admission, resulting in a final, unappealable order that relocates the trial to a different appellate court to ensure impartiality or procedural necessity.

Headnote / Official Regeste

AI-structured
The High Court of Cassation and Justice admitted the petition, ordering the transfer of the civil proceedings from the Ploiești Court of Appeal to the Târgu Mureș Court of Appeal while preserving all procedural acts already performed. The dispute involved a request for the venue transfer (strămutare) of a civil case currently pending before the Ploieși Court of Appeal, Civil Section I, with the petitioner seeking a change of jurisdiction based on grounds supported by oral submissions and supplementary documents filed on September 30, 2013. The decision relied on the procedural legal basis for transfer of jurisdiction, supported by the prosecution’s conclusions recommending admission, resulting in a final, unappealable order that relocates the trial to a different appellate court to ensure impartiality or procedural necessity.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full Text of the Judgment — Încheierea nr. 4176/2013

Se referă de către magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, Dosarul nr. 336/42/2013 al Curții de Apel Ploiești, secția I civilă, a cărui strămutare se solicită, are termen de judecată la data de 2 octombrie 2013.

Se mai referă că petenta a depus la data de 30 septembrie 2013, precizări și acte.

Petenta, având cuvântul asupra cererii de strămutare, solicită admiterea acesteia așa cum a fost formulată, pentru motivele invocate în scris și susținute oral.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public formulează concluzii de admitere a cererii de strămutare, pentru motivele invocate.

Analizând cererea,

ÎNALTA CURTE

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petenta B.R. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 336/42/2013 al Curții de Apel Ploiești, secția I civilă.

Strămută judecarea cauzei de la Curtea de Apel Ploiești, secția I civilă, la Curtea de Apel Târgu Mureș.

Păstrează actele de procedură îndeplinite.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 1 octombrie 2013.