Legislator European & Swiss Legal Corpus
Încheierea nr. 4133/2013 Dismissed AI-structured

Încheierea nr. 4133/2013 — Civil jurisdiction transfer (strămutare) denied where case records confirmed first-instance status despite claimed appellate filing

Case Number Încheierea nr. 4133/2013 (ICCJ_99895)
Court / Authority
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Jurisdiction Romania — Case Law (RO)

Decision Summary (Facts, Holding & Outcome)

AI-structured

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for the transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare) submitted by the applicants, upholding the prosecutor’s recommendation and leaving the case with its original competent court; the decision is final without appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural request to transfer a civil case pending at the Oradea Court of Appeal, triggered by the applicants' assertion that the case had been lodged at the appellate level, whereas court records indicated it remained at the Bihor County Court of First Instance. The decisive legal basis was the determination that the procedural conditions for a jurisdictional transfer were not met due to the discrepancy between the petition’s premise and the actual stage of the proceedings, rendering the request inadmissible.

Headnote / Official Regeste

AI-structured
The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for the transfer of jurisdiction (strămutare) submitted by the applicants, upholding the prosecutor’s recommendation and leaving the case with its original competent court; the decision is final without appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural request to transfer a civil case pending at the Oradea Court of Appeal, triggered by the applicants' assertion that the case had been lodged at the appellate level, whereas court records indicated it remained at the Bihor County Court of First Instance. The decisive legal basis was the determination that the procedural conditions for a jurisdictional transfer were not met due to the discrepancy between the petition’s premise and the actual stage of the proceedings, rendering the request inadmissible.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full Text of the Judgment — Încheierea nr. 4133/2013

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că deși petenții au precizat în cerere că solicită strămutarea Dosarul nr. 116/187/2011 aflat în recurs la Curtea de Apel Oradea, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor acest dosar nu a fost înregistrat pe rolul Curții de Apel Oradea, în prezent aflându-se tot la Tribunalul Bihor.

Petentul C.A. solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare.

Procurorul solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenții C.A. și C.M. privind strămutarea procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 116/187/2011 al Curții de Apel Oradea.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică astăzi, 27 septembrie 2013.