Legislator European & Swiss Legal Corpus
Încheierea nr. 4060/2013 Dismissed AI-structured

Încheierea nr. 4060/2013 — Judicial transfer of case file denied due to scheduled hearing date

Case Number Încheierea nr. 4060/2013 (ICCJ_99872)
Court / Authority
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Jurisdiction Romania — Case Law (RO)

Decision Summary (Facts, Holding & Outcome)

AI-structured

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for the transfer of jurisdiction, leaving the case with the Babadag Court. The dispute concerned a procedural request by a party to transfer the file from the Babadag Court to another instance, asserting that the legal service procedure had been fulfilled; however, the court noted that the file had an upcoming hearing scheduled for October 3, 2013, according to the institutional computerized record. The Public Ministry representative argued for dismissal, and the Court ruled that the petition failed, rendering the decision final and without appeal. The decisive legal basis was the procedural requirement for judicial transfer and the administrative necessity of maintaining case continuity ahead of a scheduled hearing, as reflected in the public prosecutor's recommendation and the court’s assessment of the institutional schedule.

Headnote / Official Regeste

AI-structured
The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petition for the transfer of jurisdiction, leaving the case with the Babadag Court. The dispute concerned a procedural request by a party to transfer the file from the Babadag Court to another instance, asserting that the legal service procedure had been fulfilled; however, the court noted that the file had an upcoming hearing scheduled for October 3, 2013, according to the institutional computerized record. The Public Ministry representative argued for dismissal, and the Court ruled that the petition failed, rendering the decision final and without appeal. The decisive legal basis was the procedural requirement for judicial transfer and the administrative necessity of maintaining case continuity ahead of a scheduled hearing, as reflected in the public prosecutor's recommendation and the court’s assessment of the institutional schedule.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full Text of the Judgment — Încheierea nr. 4060/2013

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidentă informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen la 3 octombrie 2013.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul B.T. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 76/179/2013 al Judecătoriei Babadag.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 26 septembrie 2013.