Legislator European & Swiss Legal Corpus
Încheierea nr. 4059/2013 Dismissed AI-structured

Încheierea nr. 4059/2013 — Judicial case remittal refused due to scheduled hearing date in the registry

Case Number Încheierea nr. 4059/2013 (ICCJ_99871)
Court / Authority
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Jurisdiction Romania — Case Law (RO)

Decision Summary (Facts, Holding & Outcome)

AI-structured

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed without appeal the request for case remittal filed by the petitioners. The dispute concerned a procedural application to transfer Case No. 24678/302/2011 from Bucharest Tribunal to a different jurisdiction, where the public prosecutor argued for dismissal based on the fact that the case already had a scheduled hearing date in the court's digital registry. The court found the procedural requirements for the remittal request not to be met and ordered the case to remain with the original court. The decision is based on procedural norms governing case remittal and the administrative rules of court scheduling, specifically determining that the existence of a scheduled term in the electronic registry precluded the grant of the remittal.

Headnote / Official Regeste

AI-structured
The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed without appeal the request for case remittal filed by the petitioners. The dispute concerned a procedural application to transfer Case No. 24678/302/2011 from Bucharest Tribunal to a different jurisdiction, where the public prosecutor argued for dismissal based on the fact that the case already had a scheduled hearing date in the court's digital registry. The court found the procedural requirements for the remittal request not to be met and ordered the case to remain with the original court. The decision is based on procedural norms governing case remittal and the administrative rules of court scheduling, specifically determining that the existence of a scheduled term in the electronic registry precluded the grant of the remittal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full Text of the Judgment — Încheierea nr. 4059/2013

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidentă informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen la 14 octombrie 2013.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenții U.D.V.,A.E., B.N., B.C., D.S. (fostă P.), I.V., M.L., T.D., T.L.I., D.E., P.L. și B.A. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 24678/302/2011 al Tribunalului București.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 26 septembrie 2013.