Legislator European & Swiss Legal Corpus
Încheierea nr. 3965/2013 Dismissed AI-structured

Încheierea nr. 3965/2013 — Jurisdictional transfer motion dismissed as moot due to prior resolution of underlying civil case

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3965/2013 (ICCJ_99845)
Court / Authority
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Jurisdiction Romania — Case Law (RO)

Decision Summary (Facts, Holding & Outcome)

AI-structured

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petitioner's motion for the transfer of jurisdiction, ordering that the application is rejected as remaining without object; the petitioner, who sought to move the civil case away from the Constanța Tribunal, did not prevail, while the respondent bank and the public prosecutor's office successfully argued for dismissal. The dispute concerned a procedural request for jurisdictional transfer (*strămutare*) filed against an ongoing civil proceeding, but the material facts established that the underlying case had already been adjudicated and concluded prior to the filing of this motion. The decisive legal basis was the procedural doctrine that a request for transfer of jurisdiction becomes moot and must be dismissed when the subject matter of the request, the pending case, has already been resolved, rendering the initial action superfluous.

Headnote / Official Regeste

AI-structured
The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the petitioner's motion for the transfer of jurisdiction, ordering that the application is rejected as remaining without object; the petitioner, who sought to move the civil case away from the Constanța Tribunal, did not prevail, while the respondent bank and the public prosecutor's office successfully argued for dismissal. The dispute concerned a procedural request for jurisdictional transfer (*strămutare*) filed against an ongoing civil proceeding, but the material facts established that the underlying case had already been adjudicated and concluded prior to the filing of this motion. The decisive legal basis was the procedural doctrine that a request for transfer of jurisdiction becomes moot and must be dismissed when the subject matter of the request, the pending case, has already been resolved, rendering the initial action superfluous.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full Text of the Judgment — Încheierea nr. 3965/2013

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost soluționat la data de 14 august 2013.

Avocat M.V., pentru intimata Banca C.C. pune concluzii de respingere a cererii de strămutare, având în vedere că dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită a fost soluționat.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare formulate de petent, ca rămasă fără obiect.

Constatând că dosarul a cărui soluționare se solicită a fost soluționat;

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petenta A.M. prin care solicită strămutarea judecării procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 19996/212/2011 al Tribunalului Constanța.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 24 septembrie 2013.