Legislator European & Swiss Legal Corpus
Încheierea nr. 3957/2013 Dismissed AI-structured

Încheierea nr. 3957/2013 — Denial of civil case transfer to another court jurisdiction

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3957/2013 (ICCJ_99840)
Court / Authority
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Jurisdiction Romania — Case Law (RO)

Decision Summary (Facts, Holding & Outcome)

AI-structured

The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the application for the transfer of jurisdiction, thereby upholding the original jurisdiction and leaving the case pending before the first-instance court without the possibility of appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural request by a limited liability company to transfer its civil lawsuit, filed at the Brad District Court, to another jurisdiction; the Prosecutor General opposed the transfer based on verbal arguments, and the court noted that the case had a scheduled hearing date of September 26, 2013. The decision was grounded in the procedural framework governing jurisdictional transfers, specifically the requirement that a valid petition be subject to the opposing party's objections and the court's discretionary assessment of the necessity to change the competent forum, resulting in the refusal of the transfer due to the established procedural status of the case.

Headnote / Official Regeste

AI-structured
The High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed the application for the transfer of jurisdiction, thereby upholding the original jurisdiction and leaving the case pending before the first-instance court without the possibility of appeal. The dispute concerned a procedural request by a limited liability company to transfer its civil lawsuit, filed at the Brad District Court, to another jurisdiction; the Prosecutor General opposed the transfer based on verbal arguments, and the court noted that the case had a scheduled hearing date of September 26, 2013. The decision was grounded in the procedural framework governing jurisdictional transfers, specifically the requirement that a valid petition be subject to the opposing party's objections and the court's discretionary assessment of the necessity to change the competent forum, resulting in the refusal of the transfer due to the established procedural status of the case.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full Text of the Judgment — Încheierea nr. 3957/2013

Procedura legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are termenul fixat la data de 26 septembrie 2013.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public solicită respingerea cererii de strămutare formulată de petent, pentru motivele expuse verbal.

Analizând cererea,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Respinge cererea formulată de petentul S.C. prin care solicită strămutarea judecării procesului civil ce formează obiectul Dosarului nr. 2382/195/2012 al Judecătoriei Brad.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 24 septembrie 2013.