Legislator European & Swiss Legal Corpus
DE FR IT EN
Court Decisions Legislation Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3912/2013 Inadmissible AI-structured

Încheierea nr. 3912/2013 — Jurisdiction transfer request annulled due to lack of mandatory judicial stamping

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3912/2013 (ICCJ_99829)
Court / Authority
Decision Date
Outcome Inadmissible
Jurisdiction Romania — Case Law (RO)
Open official source ↗ Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Decision Summary (Facts, Holding & Outcome)

AI-structured

The High Court of Cassation and Justice ordered the cancellation of a petitioner's request for the transfer of jurisdiction, meaning the requesting party prevailed in no aspect and the initial jurisdictional assignment remained in effect. The dispute concerned a procedural motion to transfer a civil case (Docket 2035/262/2012) from the Tribunal of Dâmbovița, where the case had a hearing scheduled for September 27, 2013. The decisive legal basis for the decision was the failure to fulfill the mandatory stamping requirement, as the court determined that the request was legally deficient because it was not properly stamped with the requisite judicial fee, leading to its annulment as a matter of form rather than on the merits.

Headnote / Official Regeste

AI-structured
The High Court of Cassation and Justice ordered the cancellation of a petitioner's request for the transfer of jurisdiction, meaning the requesting party prevailed in no aspect and the initial jurisdictional assignment remained in effect. The dispute concerned a procedural motion to transfer a civil case (Docket 2035/262/2012) from the Tribunal of Dâmbovița, where the case had a hearing scheduled for September 27, 2013. The decisive legal basis for the decision was the failure to fulfill the mandatory stamping requirement, as the court determined that the request was legally deficient because it was not properly stamped with the requisite judicial fee, leading to its annulment as a matter of form rather than on the merits.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full Text of the Judgment — Încheierea nr. 3912/2013

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Se referă de magistratul asistent asupra faptului că cererea de strămutare nu este timbrată, petenta fiind citată cu această mențiune și că, potrivit evidenței informatizate a instanțelor E., dosarul a cărui judecată se solicită a fi strămutată, are termen de judecată la 27 septembrie 2013.

Reprezentantul Ministerului Public pune concluzii de anulare a cererii ca netimbrată, iar în subsidiar de respingere, ca neîntemeiată.

Analizând cererea,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Anulează, ca netimbrată, cererea formulată de petenta R.L. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 2035/262/2012 al Tribunalului Dâmbovița.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 23 septembrie 2013.