Legislator European & Swiss Legal Corpus
DE FR IT EN
Court Decisions Legislation Analyze in Legislator
Încheierea nr. 3873/2013 Allowed / Granted AI-structured

Încheierea nr. 3873/2013 — Change of venue granted; Gorj case transferred to Timiș, prior acts preserved.

Case Number Încheierea nr. 3873/2013 (ICCJ_99821)
Court / Authority
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted
Jurisdiction Romania — Case Law (RO)
Open official source ↗ Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Decision Summary (Facts, Holding & Outcome)

AI-structured

The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) granted the petitioner’s motion to change venue, ordering that the case in File No. 2911/317/2012 pending before the Gorj Tribunal be transferred to the Timiș Tribunal, while preserving all acts performed by the original court prior to the transfer. The ruling is final and not subject to appeal. The dispute involved a procedural request for case transfer (strămutare) based on grounds raised in written and oral submissions, supported by the petitioner’s attorney and the Public Ministry’s representative, who both argued for the transfer. The court accepted the motion under the applicable procedural rules governing case reassignment, without addressing the merits of the underlying dispute, and directed the continuation of proceedings at the designated tribunal.

Headnote / Official Regeste

AI-structured
The High Court of Cassation and Justice (Civil Section I) granted the petitioner’s motion to change venue, ordering that the case in File No. 2911/317/2012 pending before the Gorj Tribunal be transferred to the Timiș Tribunal, while preserving all acts performed by the original court prior to the transfer. The ruling is final and not subject to appeal. The dispute involved a procedural request for case transfer (strămutare) based on grounds raised in written and oral submissions, supported by the petitioner’s attorney and the Public Ministry’s representative, who both argued for the transfer. The court accepted the motion under the applicable procedural rules governing case reassignment, without addressing the merits of the underlying dispute, and directed the continuation of proceedings at the designated tribunal.

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full Text of the Judgment — Încheierea nr. 3873/2013

Procedura de citare este legal îndeplinită.

Magistratul asistent face referatul cauzei și arată că, potrivit programului de evidență informatizată a instanțelor, dosarul a cărui strămutare se solicită are termen de judecată la 3 octombrie 2013.

Petentul, prin avocat, solicită admiterea cererii de strămutare, conform motivelor formulate în scris și prezentate verbal. Depune la dosar concluzii scrise însoțite de un set de înscrisuri.

Reprezentanta Ministerului Public pune concluzii de admitere a cererii de strămutare.

Analizând cererea,

ÎN NUMELE LEGII

D I S P U N E

Admite cererea formulată de petentul I.S.C. privind strămutarea pricinii care face obiectul Dosarului nr. 2911/317/2012 al Tribunalului Gorj.

Strămută judecata cauzei de la această instanță, la Tribunalul Timiș.

Păstrează actele îndeplinite de instanță înainte de strămutare.

Fără cale de atac.

Pronunțată în ședință publică, astăzi 19 septembrie 2013.