Legislator Corpus giuridico & Giurisprudenza
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VR.2016.00001 • VG ZH VR.2016.00001 Respinto (Dismissed) Generato dall'IA

VR.2016.00001 — Property Owner v. Municipality Regarding Rezoning Compensation

Numero d'incarto VR.2016.00001 (ZH_VG_001_-VR-2016-00001_13-07-2017)
Autorità giudiziaria
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Giurisdizione Canton Zurigo — Tribunali cantonali (CH-ZH)
Apri la fonte ufficiale ↗ Archivio Entscheidsuche ↗ Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi della sentenza (Oggetto del contendere & Esito)

Generato dall'IA

A property owner sought compensation for alleged material expropriation following a zoning change that reclassified their land from a reserved zone to a special recreation zone intended for family gardens. The court reviewed the claim based on whether the rezoning resulted in a demonstrable and sufficiently significant reduction in the property's value, measured by the difference in market values with and without the planning intervention. However, the court found that the economic report submitted by the claimant was insufficient because it only estimated gross revenues without providing a necessary estimate of the corresponding operating costs, making the profitability of the planned facilities questionable, thus failing to prove a legally compensable value diminution from the rezoning.

Massima giurisprudenziale / Regesto

Generato dall'IA
§ 4a VRG; Art. 5 Abs. II RPG; Art. 5 RPG; Art. 29 Abs. I BV — § 4a VRG: This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its application in the decision's substance or procedure, although the dispositive itself is summarized rather than fully enumerated. Art. 5 Abs. II RPG: This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its application in the decision's substance or procedure, although the dispositive itself is summarized rather than fully enumerated. Art. 5 RPG: This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its application in the decision's substance or procedure, although the dispositive itself is summarized rather than fully enumerated.

Questioni giuridiche chiave & norme applicate

Generato dall'IA
§ 4a VRG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its application in the decision's substance or procedure, although the dispositive itself is summarized rather than fully enumerated.

Art. 5 Abs. II RPG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its application in the decision's substance or procedure, although the dispositive itself is summarized rather than fully enumerated.

Art. 5 RPG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its application in the decision's substance or procedure, although the dispositive itself is summarized rather than fully enumerated.

Art. 29 Abs. I BV

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its application in the decision's substance or procedure, although the dispositive itself is summarized rather than fully enumerated.

Art. 26 Abs. II BV

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its application in the decision's substance or procedure, although the dispositive itself is summarized rather than fully enumerated.

§ 46 AbtrG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms, implying its application in the decision's substance or procedure, although the dispositive itself is summarized rather than fully enumerated (the summary mentions the dismissal of the appeal).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo integrale della sentenza — VR.2016.00001

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VR.2016.00001

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](https://vgrzh.djiktzh.ch/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=https://vgrzh.djiktzh.ch&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=217367&W10_KEY=4467072&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VR.2016.00001 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 13.07.2017 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/3. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Das Bundesgericht hat eine Beschwerde in öffentlich-rechtlichen Angelegenheiten gegen diesen Entscheid am 03.10.2018 gutgeheissen und den Entscheid des Verwaltungsgerichts aufgehoben. · Rechtsgebiet: · Enteignungsrecht · Betreff: · materielle Enteignung · Materielle Enteignung [Die Rekurrentin macht Entschädigungsansprüche aus materieller Enteignung geltend, weil ihre Grundstücke von der Freihaltezone in die Besondere Erholungszone (Familiengartenareal) umgezont wurden.] Grundsätze der beförderlichen Verfahrenserledigung (E. 3.2 ff.). Es ist zu prüfen, ob die Zonenplanänderung zu einem Minderwert der Grundstücke und damit zu einer materiellen Enteignung geführt hat (Differenz der Verkehrswerte, die die Grundstücke ohne den planerischen Eingriff und mit ihm aufweisen, E. 6.1). Der von der Rekurrentin beigebrachte Bericht genügt den Anforderungen an die verlangte Wirtschaftlichkeitsrechnung nicht. Der wesentlichste Mangel des Berichts besteht darin, dass nur die Bruttoerträge geschätzt werden. Eine Schätzung des hierzu erforderlichen Aufwands fehlt. Ob sich das Projekt überhaupt kostendeckend betreiben lässt, erscheint daher fraglich (E. 6.3.2). Die Rekurrentin vermag nicht zu beweisen, dass die geplanten Sportanlagen rentabel hätten betrieben werden können (E. 6.3.4 f.). Zusammenfassend führte die streitbetroffene Umzonung nicht zu einer nachweisbaren und hinreichend wesentlichen Wertminderung (E. 6.4). Abweisung des Rekurses. · --- · Stichworte: · AUSZONUNG BEFÖRDERLICHKEIT BESCHLEUNIGUNGSGEBOT BEWERTUNG EIGENTUMSBESCHRÄNKUNG ENTEIGNUNG ENTEIGNUNGSENTSCHÄDIGUNG ENTSCHÄDIGUNG MATERIELLE ENTEIGNUNG MINDERWERT RECHTSVERZÖGERUNG RENTABILITÄT SCHÄTZUNG SCHÄTZUNGSKOMMISSION SCHÄTZUNGSVERFAHREN UMZONUNG VERFAHRENSERLEDIGUNG WERT · Rechtsnormen: · § 46 AbtrG Art. 26 Abs. II BV Art. 29 Abs. I BV Art. 5 RPG Art. 5 Abs. II RPG § 4a VRG · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 3