Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep II Ips 216/2004 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2004:II.IPS.216.2004 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case where appellate court had not yet ruled on the appeal.

Numero d'incarto Sklep II Ips 216/2004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia declared the appeal withdrawn because the appellate court had not yet made a decision on the merits. The opposing party had previously lost a lower court case regarding the return of seized property and filed a timely appeal, which was served to the court and the Prosecutor's Office. Since the appellate court had not yet examined the appeal, the Supreme Court merely confirmed the withdrawal without addressing the substantive legal arguments.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

375. člen ZPP; 383. člen ZPP; 37. člen ZNP: If the appellate court has not yet decided on an appeal, the withdrawal of the appeal is confirmed without examining the merits.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
appeal withdrawal supreme court procedure appellate court decision civil procedure law seized property restitution prestazioni indebitamente riscosse polipragmasia spese per malattia prese in carico

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
375. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
Revizija je bila vročena nasprotni stranki in Vrhovnemu državnemu tožilstvu RS (375. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku, Ur.
383. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
334. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku
37. člen Zakona o nepravdnem postopku
Generato dall'IA
Sklep II Ips 120/2004
Court dismisses appeal withdrawal case where defendant withdrew appeal before second instance court ruling.
VSL Sodba I Cp 1818/2018
Appeal dismissed; contract validity prevails over unfulfilled expropriation purpose, barring higher compensation claims.
VSRS Sodba I Ips 58314/2017
Supreme Court dismisses appeal on theft conviction, upholding defendant's valid waiver of presence rights.
Sodba II Ips 943/2008
Court rejects appeal, holding worker partially liable for own safety but upholding reduced non-property damage compensation.
Sklep II Ips 897/94
Supreme Court allows appeal against seizure compensation, ruling State Forests are state entities not local municipalities.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Ugotovi se umik revizije.

[JEDRO]

Revizijsko sodišče o vloženi reviziji še ni odločalo, zato je le ugotovilo njen umik.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je odločilo o zahtevku predlagateljice za vrnitev zaplenjenega premoženja in naložilo nasprotni udeleženki plačilo odškodnine v obveznicah v skladu z Zakonom o izdaji obveznic za plačilo odškodnine za zaplenjeno premoženje zaradi razveljavitve kazni zaplembe premoženja. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo nasprotne udeleženke in potrdilo izpodbijani sklep.

Zoper tako pravnomočno odločbo je nasprotna udeleženka vložila pravočasno revizijo.

Revizija je bila vročena nasprotni stranki in Vrhovnemu državnemu tožilstvu RS (375. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku, Ur. l. RS, št. 36/04 - p.b., ZPP).

S pisno vlogo, ki je na sodišče prispela 21.6.2004, je nasprotna udeleženka umaknila vloženo revizijo.

Revizijsko sodišče o vloženi reviziji še ni odločalo, zato je le ugotovilo njen umik (383. člen v zvezi s 334. členom ZPP in v zvezi s 37. členom Zakona o nepravdnem postopku).