Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep I R 84/2004 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2004:I.R.84.2004 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court rejects transfer of enforcement case due to lack of weighty reasons under ZPP Art. 67.

Numero d'incarto Sklep I R 84/2004
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected a request to transfer an enforcement proceeding to another court. The applicant argued that the debtor's sister, who was the enforcement officer at the local court, should trigger a transfer under Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act. The court held that the presence of a relative does not constitute a weighty reason for transfer since another judge could conduct the proceedings, and the request was therefore dismissed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act; A request to transfer proceedings based solely on the debtor's relative being the enforcement officer is rejected as it lacks weighty reasons, and the court must proceed with another judge if necessary.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
enforcement proceedings transfer of jurisdiction weighty reasons Civil Procedure Act enforcement officer relative of debtor procedural transfer procedura di pianificazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
VSRS Sklep III R 5/2021
Supreme Court assigns exclusive jurisdiction to Ljubljana District Court for copyright-related enforcement disputes.
Sklep I R 49/2005
Supreme Court confirms original court jurisdiction for continuing enforcement with new means under ZIZ Art. 35.
Sklep I R 189/2007
Supreme Court rules local court in Sevnici has jurisdiction over enforcement of bank account funds based on debtor's residence.
Sklep I R 112/2005
Supreme Court transfers enforcement case to another court due to employee's employment at the original court raising impartiality doubts.
VSRS Sklep I R 49/2022
Supreme Court dismisses premature jurisdiction dispute when general court transfers case to labor court without opposing jurisdiction.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlog za določitev drugega pristojnega sodišča se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Dolžničina sestra - izvršilna sodnica ni edina sodnica na tem sodišču, kar pomeni, da bo lahko postopek vodila druga sodnica in tako ni potrebno zadeve prenašati na drugo sodišče. Kolikor pa predlog meri na izločitev vseh sodnic tega sodišča, ni mogoče o stvari odločati na podlagi predpisov o smotrni delegaciji, marveč po postopku in materialnopravnih določbah tretjega poglavja ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Upnica je na Okrajnem sodišču v Radovljici vložila predlog za izvršbo na podlagi verodostojne listine. To sodišče je predlagalo, naj vrhovno sodišče na podlagi 67. člena ZPP določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, ker je dolžnica sestra izvršilne sodnice tega sodišča.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Vrhovno sodišče lahko na predlog pristojnega sodišča določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, če so za to dani tehtni razlogi (67. člen ZPP). Vendar med te ni mogoče uvrstiti navedenega razloga. Dolžničina sestra - izvršilna sodnica ni edina sodnica na tem sodišču, kar pomeni, da bo lahko postopek vodila druga sodnica in tako ni potrebno zadeve prenašati na drugo sodišče. Kolikor pa predlog meri na izločitev vseh sodnic tega sodišča, ni mogoče o stvari odločati na podlagi predpisov o smotrni delegaciji, marveč po postopku in materialnopravnih določbah tretjega poglavja ZPP. Zaradi povedanega je bilo treba predlog zavrniti.